Introduction
In the complex intersection of religious practice and legal proceedings, Indian courts have long grappled with a unique challenge: How do you ensure justice when a witness has taken a religious vow of silence? The answer lies in the progressive interpretation of Section 119 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which demonstrates the law’s remarkable ability to adapt to diverse circumstances while preserving both religious freedom and judicial integrity.
The Legal Foundation: Understanding Section 119
Section 119 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides a crucial framework for witnesses who cannot communicate through conventional speech. The section states that “a witness who is unable to speak may give his evidence in any other manner in which he can make it intelligible, as by writing or by signs; but such writing must be written and the signs made in open Court. Evidence so given shall be deemed to be oral evidence.”
This provision, originally designed for individuals with speech disabilities, has been ingeniously extended to accommodate those whose religious beliefs prevent them from speaking.
Landmark Legal Precedent: The Sadhu’s Testimony
The Lakhan Singh Case: Setting the Standard
The pivotal case of Lakhan Singh v. King-Emperor (1941) 20 Pat 898 established the legal precedent that continues to guide courts today. In this remarkable case:
-
A Sadhu (holy man) who had witnessed an assault was called to testify
-
Due to his religious vow of silence, he could not provide oral testimony
-
The court faced the dilemma of respecting religious practices while ensuring justice
-
The judicial ruling was groundbreaking: the court held that such a witness “shall be deemed unable to speak within the meaning provided under Section 119 of the Indian Evidence Act”
This decision created a bridge between spiritual devotion and legal obligation, ensuring that religious practices would not become barriers to justice.
Practical Implementation: How Courts Handle Silent Witnesses
The Written Testimony Process
When a witness has taken a religious vow of silence, courts follow a carefully structured procedure:
In-Court Documentation:
-
All questions are presented to the witness in writing
-
The witness responds through written statements
-
The entire process must occur in open court to maintain transparency
-
Written responses are treated with the same legal weight as oral testimony
Legal Equivalence:
-
Written statements are deemed to be “oral evidence” under the law
-
This classification ensures no diminished legal status
-
The testimony maintains full credibility and admissibility
Modern Enhancements: Technology Meets Tradition
21st Century Safeguards
Contemporary legal practice has introduced additional protections and procedures:
Video Documentation:
-
All written testimony sessions are videographed
-
This prevents later disputes about the witness’s responses
-
Creates a permanent, verifiable record of the proceedings
Professional Assistance:
-
Courts may employ interpreters or special educators
-
These professionals help ensure clear communication
-
They assist in translating complex legal concepts when necessary
Judicial Oversight:
-
The presiding judge maintains strict supervision throughout
-
Ensures the process adheres to legal standards
-
Protects both the witness’s rights and the integrity of the proceedings
Broader Implications: Religious Freedom in the Justice System
Balancing Competing Interests
This legal approach demonstrates several important principles:
Respect for Religious Diversity:
-
Acknowledges the validity of various spiritual practices
-
Prevents discrimination based on religious beliefs
-
Ensures equal access to the justice system
Judicial Accessibility:
-
Maintains that religious practices cannot excuse participation in legal proceedings
-
Provides alternative methods for fulfilling civic duties
-
Preserves the court’s ability to gather all relevant evidence
Legal Innovation:
-
Shows how traditional laws can adapt to unique circumstances
-
Demonstrates judicial creativity in problem-solving
-
Sets precedent for handling similar future cases
Conclusion: A Model of Inclusive Justice
The treatment of witnesses under religious vows of silence represents a remarkable achievement in legal accommodation. By interpreting Section 119 of the Evidence Act to include those bound by spiritual commitments, Indian courts have created a framework that respects religious freedom while ensuring that justice remains accessible to all.