Hemul Tayal vs State Of Punjab on 10 June, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Hemul Tayal vs State Of Punjab on 10 June, 2025

                                                     1

     ITEM NO.18                              COURT NO.4                SECTION II-B

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                  No(s).    8782/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-05-2025
     in CRMM No. 27770/2025 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana
     at Chandigarh]

     HEMUL TAYAL                                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     STATE OF PUNJAB                                                    Respondent(s)

     FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

     Date : 10-06-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
                              [PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAY BENCH]

     For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.M.S.Bedi, Sr. Adv.
                         Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR
                         Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Adv.

     For Respondent(s) : Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR
                         Mr. Suneet Pal Singh Aulakh, Adv.
                         Mr. Nakul Mohta, Adv.
                         Mr. Ayush Kashyap, Adv.

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                           O R D E R

We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

Having perused the record and appreciating the reasons stated

by the High Court in the order impugned, we are of the view that no

ground is made out warranting our interference in the exercise of

our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Signature Not Verified

The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed accordingly.
Digitally signed by
Jayant Kumar Arora
Date: 2025.06.10
16:59:35 IST
Reason:

At this stage, Mr. M. M. S. Bedi, learned senior counsel

appearing for the petitioner, states that the petitioner may be
2

granted reasonable time to surrender and file a regular bail

petition before the court of competent jurisdiction, and the same

may be directed to be considered expeditiously by the final Court.

In view of the above, the petitioner is granted two weeks’

time to surrender and move an application for the grant of regular

bail. The application for bail may be considered on its own merits

by the trial court, uninfluenced by any of the observations made in

this order or the order dated 20.05.2025.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed

of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA)                                    (RANJANA SHAILEY)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR