Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Shaitan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:26962) on 11 June, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:26962]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6908/2025
Shaitan S/o Peevlal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Meghniwas
Suwaniya, Ps Begun, Dist Chittorgarh (Raj.) (At Present In
Judicial Custody At Jail Barmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sameer Khan
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL (VACATION JUDGE)
Order
11/06/2025
1. This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (Section
439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been
arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.127/2025 registered at Police
Station Sadar Barmer, District Barmer for the offences under
Sections 305(a), 331(4) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in the present case and initially, he
was not named in the FIR and no recovery is pending to be made
from the petitioner. The offences alleged against the present
petitioner are triable by Magistrate. There are bleak chances of the
petitioner influencing the material prosecution witnesses of the
case or tampering with the evidence or fleeing away from justice,
in case petitioner is enlarged on bail. Lastly, learned counsel for
(Downloaded on 11/06/2025 at 09:08:03 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:26962] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6908/2025]
the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody
since 13.05.2025 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently
long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the
accused-petitioner.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the bail application.
5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on
merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the
petitioner on bail.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS
(Section 439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-
petitioner Shaitan S/o Peevlal arrested in connection with F.I.R.
No.127/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Barmer, District
Barmer, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case,
provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two
sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial
court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date
of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the
trial.
7. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations
made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail
application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
(SUNIL BENIWAL (VACATION JUDGE)),J
74-AnilKC/-
(Downloaded on 11/06/2025 at 09:08:03 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)