[ad_1]
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Tukaramji)
We have heard Mr. P. Prabhaker Reddy, learned counsel for
Accused No.1 in Criminal Appeal No.182 of 2014; Mr. T. Pradyumna
Kumar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Accused Nos.2 and
3 in Criminal Appeals Nos.182 of 2014 and 212 of 2014 respectively;
Smt. B. Prathibha, learned counsel for Accused No.4 in Criminal Appeal
No.41 of 2023; and Mr. Syed Yasin Mamoon, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor, appearing for the State in Criminal Appeal No.1160 of 2017.
2. Since all these appeals arise from the same judgment, we propose
to adjudicate them through this common judgment.
3. Criminal Appeal No.182 of 2014 has been preferred by Accused
Nos.1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused Nos.1 and 2’); Criminal
Appeal No.212 of 2014 has been filed by Accused No.3 (hereinafter
‘Accused No.3’); and Criminal Appeal No.41 of 2023 has been filed by
Accused No.4 (hereinafter ‘Accused No.4’). All these appeals challenge
the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 13.01.2014, delivered in
Sessions Case No.486 of 2010 by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge,
Hyderabad.
[ad_2]
Source link