In Wp(C) No. 2176/2024 vs Eva Kumari And Others on 6 June, 2025

0
34

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

In Wp(C) No. 2176/2024 vs Eva Kumari And Others on 6 June, 2025

Author: Rajnesh Oswal

Bench: Rajnesh Oswal

                                                                                   2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
           HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                           AT JAMMU
                                                                 Reserved on 28.05.2025
                                                              Pronounced on 06.06.2025

CJ Court

LPA No. 95/2025
In WP(C) No. 2176/2024
Chairperson J&K, Board of Professional ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Entrance Examinations, Jammu
                  Through: Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, GA



                                  v/s
Eva Kumari and others                                  .... Respondent(s)

                   Through:      Mr. Achal Sharma, Adv. for
                                 caveator/respondent No. 1

CORAM:      HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.

                               JUDGMENT

Per Oswal-J

1. With the appearance of Mr. Achal Sharma, learned counsel for respondent

No. 1, caveat stands discharged.

2. The respondent No. 1, a tribal girl, resident of remote Village of Sial Sui,

Tehsil Kalakote, District Rajouri, by dint of sheer hard work and

dedication succeeded in getting her name figured in the provisional merit

list of NEET(UG)-2024 belonging to Union Territory of J&K and Ladakh

issued vide Notification No. 084-BOPEE of 2024 dated 25.08.2024. But

due to failed online transaction for payment of Rs. 1,500/- as the

prerequisite for participation in counselling, she was not allowed to

participate in the 1stcounseling for admission to MBBS/BDS course. As a

consequence thereof, she could not find a place in the provisional select list
2

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
LPA Nos. 95/2025

issued by the appellants vide notification No. 093-BOPEE of 2024 dated

03.09.2024 despite the fact that she had secured 500 marks whereas the

candidate having 475 marks was selected in ST(ii) category. This

prompted respondent No. 1 to knock the doors of the Court with the writ

petition bearing WP(C) No. 2176/2024 for directing the appellants to

process her case and to place her in the select list at due place in view of

her merit and eligibility and admit her in the MBBS course after allotment

of College as per the preferences made by her in application form. A

prayer was also made by the respondent No. 1 for directing the appellants

to place her in the second selection list against any available vacancy of

ST(ii) in view of her merit and eligibility and admit her in the MBBS

course after allotment of college as per preferences made by her in

application form. It was pleaded by respondent No.1 that after her name

figured in the provisional merit list, her father went to a Cyber Cafe to

deposit Rs.1,500/- as a fee with the BOPEE and after the transaction was

done, acknowledgement was also issued to her father. When her name was

not found in the provisional merit list dated 03.09.2024, she approached

the appellants but was told that an email was sent to her on 31.08.2024 at

her email address, whereby she was informed to deposit Rs.1,500/-.

Respondent No. 1, in fact, was under bona fide belief that fee had been

paid from her side and she also could not come across any such e-mail sent

by the office of the appellants to her. Respondent No.1 also pleaded that

she may also be considered for the second selection list which was to be

issued after 06.09.2024. The learned writ court vide its interim order dated
3

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
LPA Nos. 95/2025

05.09.2024 directed the appellants to reserve one under the ST(ii) category

in the Government Medical College, Jammu for MBBS course and

respondent No.1 was allowed to participate in the counseling process.

3. The appellants, in the month of November-2024, came up with their

response to object the claim of respondent No.1, by stating that an ample

opportunity was provided to the respondent No.1 to deposit the requisite

fee in reference to notification dated 27.08.2024 but she failed to take any

step towards fulfilling the mandatory requirement and now through the

medium of writ petition, the respondent No.1 has come up with an after-

thought story to gain undue advantage in her favour. It was also stated that

it was specifically mentioned in the notification No. 086-BOPEE dated

27.08.2024 that the candidates shall have to pay online counseling fee of

Rs. 1,500/- as mentioned in e-Information Brochure NEET(UG)-2024. In

e-Information Brochure of 2024 for MBBS/BDS, there was a stipulation

that the candidate shall not be eligible for counseling if the candidate

failed to pay online fee prescribed by the Board. As the respondent No.1

had failed to pay the requisite fee, an email was sent on 31.08.2024 at 6.47

PM on her personal e-mail ID but despite that no fee was deposited.

Resultantly, her candidature was not considered for final selection on

03.09.2024.

4. Learned writ court, after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, vide

its judgment dated 03.02.2025 allowed the writ petition preferred by the

respondent No.1 and directed the appellants to accommodate the

respondent No.1 for the ongoing MBBS course in the Government
4

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
LPA Nos. 95/2025

Medical College, Jammu, so as to save her, suffering not only loss of seat

which she has deservingly earned on the basis of her merit but also a loss

of precious one year.

5. The appellants have assailed the aforesaid judgment passed by the learned

writ court on the same grounds as urged by them before the writ court that

fault, if any, was of the respondent No.1 and they had already laid CM No.

6010/2024 before the learned writ court for modification of interim order

dated 05.09.2024 but the learned Single Judge did not consider the same. It

is also urged by the appellants that besides respondent No.1, 18 other

candidates also had not deposited the fee, and they were accordingly

informed to deposit the requisite fee through email. While 05 candidates

responded to the mail and deposited the prescribed fee within the

stipulated time and they were allowed to participate in counseling,

respondent No.1 did not choose to respond along with other candidates

and as such, their candidature was rejected. The appellants have also

objected to the observations made by the learned writ court that it was

done to accommodate a blue-eyed candidate.

6. Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, learned GA representing the appellants has

vehemently argued that both in e-Information Brochure for NEET(UG)-

2024 and in the notification dated 27.08.2024, the candidates were duly

informed that they were under obligation to deposit Rs.1,500/- as

counseling fee and in the event of non-payment of the fee of Rs.1,500/-,

their candidature shall not be considered. He has submitted that as per own

documentary evidence placed on record by the respondent No.1
5

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
LPA Nos. 95/2025

herself in the form of receipt of online transaction, the payment status has

been mentioned as invalid transaction on Card, as such, it was within the

knowledge of respondent No. 1 that she had not made the payment of Rs.

1,500/-. Mr. Bhatia further has further submitted that the learned writ court

could not have issued directions to the appellants to accommodate

respondent No.1 for the ongoing MBBS course in the Government

Medical College, Jammu particularly when the selection process was time

specific and the courses in the colleges had already commenced.

7. Mr. Achal Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant has argued that the

respondent No. 1 was having abona fide belief that a fee of Rs.1,500/- has

been deposited but in fact, the online transaction had failed. He has further

submitted that the learned writ court has rightly passed the judgment and

there is neither any illegality nor infirmity in the same.

8. Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the record.

9. It goes without saying that many students in the Science Stream have the

dream of becoming either a Doctor or an Engineer and they burn midnight

oil to come out with flying colours in the highly competitive examination

conducted on the national level in the form of NEET/JEE respectively.

10. The respondent No. 1 is admittedly a Scheduled Tribe-ii candidate who

vied with others to find a place in the merit list of NEET(UG)-2024 for

admission to MBBS/BDS course. Respondent No.1, in fact, succeeded and

found a deserving place in the provisional merit list issued vide

notification No. 084/BOPEE dated 25.08.2024.

6

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
LPA Nos. 95/2025

11. Article 15 of the Constitution of India provides that there should be no

discrimination on the basis of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth and

at the same time, leaves the State free for making special provision for the

advancement of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or

for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. A special provision has

been made for the benefit of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes so as to

bring them at par with the other citizens of India to ensure that the equality

is achieved in real sense. Depriving a Scheduled Tribe student, a resident

of far-flung village of border District of Rajouri, chance of becoming a

doctor just because of failure of online transaction would defeat the very

essence of the Constitution. This is true that there was a stipulation in the

notification dated 27.08.2024 as well as in the e-Brochure of NEET(UG)-

2024 that a candidate was required to deposit Rs. 1,500/- online fee and

failure to do so would entail rejection of the candidature but at the same

time, we find that the father of respondent No.1travelled to the Cyber Café

to deposit the amount of Rs. 1,500/- but the online transaction failed for

unknown reasons. It is not that no effort was made by respondent No.1 to

pay online fee of Rs.1,500.

12. We are in perfect agreement with the observations made by the learned

writ court that the provision of nonpayment of fee resulting into rejection

of the candidature, would only apply in a case where the candidate does

not venture out to deposit fee but here is the case where the father of the

respondent No.1 did his best to pay Rs.1,500/- through Cyber Cafe but for

one reason or another, the amount could not be paid due to failure of
7

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
LPA Nos. 95/2025

online transaction. Just because of failure of online transaction, respondent

No.1 cannot be blamed for not having deposited the counseling fee as

required by the appellants.

13. The record depicts that respondent No.1 participated in the second round

of counseling but there was no seat of her choice available in the ST(ii)

category. In CM No. 7039/2024 preferred before the writ court, it was

stated that the respondent No.1 submitted counseling form along with

prescribed fee of Rs.1,500/- and she was allowed to participate in the

counseling but as there was no short fall of seat received in ST(ii) (female

category MBBS course), the respondent No.1 could not be admitted for

MBBS course.

14. If we accept the contention of the appellants and deprive respondent No. 1

a Scheduled Tribe female student, an opportunity to undergo MBBS

course, just because of technical failure of online transaction, we would be

failing in our constitutional obligation to uphold the majesty of the

Constitution, and more particularly Article 14 and 15 of the Constitution

of India. After having gone through the judgment passed by the learned

writ court, we find that the writ court has rightly considered the matter but

at the same time, we find that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble

Apex Court in S. Kishna Sradha v State of Andhra Pradesh and others

2020 AIR SC 47, respondent No. 1 was required to be admitted for MBBS

course in Government Medical College, Jammu in the next academic year,

as the admissions stand already completed and the students have already

undergone the course for more than 8 months.

8

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1475-DB
LPA Nos. 95/2025

Accordingly, the judgment of the writ court is modified to the extent that

the appellants are directed to admit respondent No. 1 for MBBS course in

Government Medical College, Jammu in the next academic year and they

are further directed to take up the matter with the concerned authority to

increase one seat of MBBS under the ST(ii) category for the next

academic session.

15. Accordingly, the instant appeal is disposed of by modifying the impugned

judgment in the manner hereinabove.

                        (RAJNESH OSWAL)                 (ARUN PALLI)
                            JUDGE                       CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu:
06.06.2025
Rakesh
                        Whether the order is speaking:   Yes/No
                        Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here