Dilipkumar P S vs Vedanta S J @ Vedanta Sangamesh J on 13 June, 2025

0
2


This is a private complaint filed by the complainant

against the accused for the offence punishable under

Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The brief facts of the complainant’s case is as

under:

It is contended that, complainant and the accused

are well acquainted with each other and in such

acquittance, in the year 2018, the accused demanded the

C.C.No.31090/2022

complainant to become a participant /subscriber of a chit

business pertaining to two chits for total amount of Rs.8

lakhs which the complainant agreed and it concluded in the

year 2019. As there was the pandemic of Covid -19, the

accused took time to return back the chit amount and

accordingly, had issued four post dated cheques of different

months ie., two cheques bearing No.000017, dt:15.04.2022

for Rs.2 Lakhs and another cheque bearing No. 000018,

dt:15.05.2022 for Rs.2 Lakhs drawn on Kotak Mahindra

Bank, BEL Layout, Bangalore. In the first week of April

2022, when the complainant demanded the repayment of

the chit amount, the accused had assured to present the

cheques in the first week of June 2022 assuring its honour

and accordingly, when the complainant presented the above

referred two cheques through his banker ie, State Bank of

India, West of Chord Road Branch, Bangalore, the same

came to be dishonored with shara as Funds Insufficient dt:



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here