Patna High Court – Orders
Raju Rai @ Raju Ranjan vs The State Of Bihar on 16 June, 2025
Author: Rajesh Kumar Verma
Bench: Rajesh Kumar Verma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17843 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2024 Thana- PARSA District- Saran
======================================================
Raju Rai @ Raju Ranjan Son of Harendra Prasad Ray @ Harendra Rai
Resident of Village - Saray Mujaffar, P.S. - Dariyapur, District - Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Kumar Ramesh Chandra, Advocate
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 16-06-2025
Heard Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for
the petitioner, Mr. Kumar Ramesh Chandra, learned counsel for
the informant as well as Mr. Amitesh Kumar, learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024, F.I.R. dated
21.02.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149,
341, 323, 307, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. According to prosecution case, the petitioner
along with other co-accused persons is said to have assaulted the
informant with sword, rod, butt of the pistol, stick etc. It is
further alleged that one co-accused person, namely, Surendra
Rai, snatched gold chain from the informant’s neck, one co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17843 of 2025(3) dt.16-06-2025
2/4
accused person, namely, Shubham Kumar looted Rs. 53,000/-
from the cash box of the shop and other co-accused persons
looted a lot of articles from informant’s shop. They also
threatened the informant to kill on non-fulfillment of extortion
money.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been
implicated in the present case. He further submits that the
allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the
petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the
F.I.R. He further submits that although there is specific
allegation against the petitioner in the FIR that he has assaulted
the informant and informant has received injuries but injury
report of the informant suggests that the injuries are simple in
nature.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently
opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and
circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent and injury
report of the informant suggest that injuries are simple in nature,
let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17843 of 2025(3) dt.16-06-2025
3/4
surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days
from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Saran at Chapra in
connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure/ 482 (2) of the BNSS, 2023 and with other
following conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17843 of 2025(3) dt.16-06-2025
4/4acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
priyanka/-
U T