Md. Ajaj Ahmad @ Md. Ajaj vs The State Of Bihar on 16 June, 2025

0
2

Patna High Court – Orders

Md. Ajaj Ahmad @ Md. Ajaj vs The State Of Bihar on 16 June, 2025

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70179 of 2024
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Ajaj Ahmad @ Md. Ajaj Son of Md. Asfaque Ahmad R/O Vill.- Osari
                 Ramganj, Ward no. 09, P.S.- Forbesganj, Dist.- Araria.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Danishta Praveen Daughter of Md. Jubair, Wife of Md. Ajaj @ Md. Ajaj
                 Ahmad R/O Vill.- Simrahi, Ward no. 05, P.S.- Raghopur, Dist.- Supaul, At
                 Present- Nagar Parishad, Supaul, Gajana Chowk, P.S. and Dist.- Supaul.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner          :    Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the O.P. No.2       :        Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate
                 For the State               :    Mrs. Meena Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   16-06-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned APP for the

State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences

punishable under Sections 498A, 341, 342, 323, 325, 504, 379,

406 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioner is the husband and there is allegation

of demand of dowry and torture.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

that the allegations made in the complaint are totally false. As a

matter of fact, the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant/

opposite party no.2 in his house with full honour and dignity.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70179 of 2024(4) dt.16-06-2025
2/3

This was the stand taken before the Mediation Center where on

several dates the opposite party no.2 did not appear, despite

issuance of notice by the Mediation Center itself. On the

strength of such facts, it has been submitted that the opposite

party no.2 is neither interested to take part in the proceeding nor

is interested in staying with the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2

submits that on account of some communication gap, she could

not participate in the mediation proceedings. He further submits

that as she has suffered injury at the hands of the petitioner, she

is not agreeable to live with him.

6. At this stage, the petitioner offers to give Rs.1500/-

(Rupees Fifteen Thousand) per month to the opposite party no.2

in the first week of every month. It goes without saying that the

aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order passed in

matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral

proceedings.

7. In such view of the matter, let the above named

petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or

surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four

weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70179 of 2024(4) dt.16-06-2025
3/3

each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is

pending/successor Court in connection with Mahila P.S. Case

No.25 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under

Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is

directed to make available the bank account details of opposite

party no.2 to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from

today. If the opposite party no.2 furnishes the bank account in

which the amount can be transferred, and yet the petitioner fails

to give the aforesaid amount on two consecutive dates to

opposite party no.2, the opposite party would be at liberty to file

an application for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

9. However, an argument on behalf of the petitioner

has been made that opposite party no.2 has now remarried and

in case the petitioner is able to furnish any evidence in that

regard before the learned Court below the payment of Rs.1500/-

can be altered with.

10. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

Trivedi/-

U       T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here