Mohd Imran vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27250) on 16 June, 2025

0
22

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Mohd Imran vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27250) on 16 June, 2025

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2025:RJ-JD:27250]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7083/2025

Mohd Imran S/o Abdul Shakur, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Chhipa
Colony Outside Nagori Gate District Jodhpur
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Rajendra Kumar Soni
For Respondent(s)         :     Ms. Sonu Manawat, P.P.
                                Mr. Sharwan Kumar, for complainant



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

16/06/2025

1. Apprehending the arrest, the present bail application has

been filed by the petitioner Mohd Imran S/o Abdul Shakur under

Section 482 BNSS (Section 438 Cr.P.C.) in connection with FIR

No.06/2025 registered at Police Station Kherapa, District Jodhpur

for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has nothing to do with the alleged transaction since neither there

are allegations against him for inducing the complainant or

receiving any property or causing any loss to him. There was a

transaction between the co-accused and the complainant, in which

an instrument was executed and the petitioner appended his

signature as a witness. He is not the beneficiary of the instrument.

Present is not a case, where custodial interrogation would be

required and the alleged offence do not contain punishment of

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:35:09 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27250] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7083/2025]

more than 7 years. Thus, the petitioner has a good case for

anticipatory bail.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the bail application.

4. Heard. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel

for the petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and

circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on

the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow

the anticipatory bail application.

5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The

S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kherapa, District

Jodhpur in FIR No.06/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest

of the petitioner – Mohd Imran S/o Abdul Shakur, he shall be

released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each

to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the

concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself
available for interrogation by a police officer as and
when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or
indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise
to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to
the court or any police officer, and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India
without previous permission of the court.

(FARJAND ALI),J
201-AnilKC/-

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:35:09 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here