Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Naveen vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27377) on 18 June, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:27377]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7216/2025
Naveen S/o Shri Bulaki Prasad, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Ward
No. 8 Jetpur Ps Mahajan, District Bikaner Rajasthan (Presently
Lodged At District Jail Bikaner)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tirath Raj Singh Sodha
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Chundawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
(VACATION JUDGE)
Order
18/06/2025
This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been
filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with
F.I.R. No.171/2024, registered at Police Station Mahajan, District
Bikaner, for the offences under Sections 333, 103(1), 3(5),
115(2), 74, 324(2) and 126(2) of IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and
there is not an iota of evidence to connect the petitioner with the
alleged crime. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits
that the co-accused person namely Dinesh has already been
enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order
(Downloaded on 18/06/2025 at 09:42:32 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27377] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7216/2025]
dated 28.05.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application
No.5265/2025.
In addition to this, learned counsel for the petitioner also
submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 07.11.2024 and
the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, he
prayed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand has vehemently
opposed the bail application and submitted that there are twenty
two other criminal cases of similar nature pending against the
present petitioner. Looking to the gravity of the offences and on
account of seriousness of the crime committed by the petitioner,
the benefit of bail shall not be extended to the petitioner.
I have considered the submissions made by both parties and
have perused the material available on record. The head injury on
the skull of the deceased Deepesh is attributed to accused Bulaki
Prasad. The petitioner is the son of the said accused. The victim
happened to be the cousin of Bulaki Das. There seems to be a
family feud between the siblings with regard to some property.
The investigation has been completed and the challan has already
been presetned and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long
time to conclude; the co-accused person has already been
enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; without
expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court
is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is
allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner – Naveen
S/o Shri Bulaki Prasad, arrested in connection with F.I.R.
No.171/2024, registered at Police Station Mahajan, District
(Downloaded on 18/06/2025 at 09:42:32 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27377] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7216/2025]
Bikaner, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case,
provided he furnishes a personal bond in sum of Rs.50,000/-
along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of
learned trial Court, for his appearance before that Court on each
and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till
completion of the trial.
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),VJ
161-Mrityunjay Singh Rathore/-
(Downloaded on 18/06/2025 at 09:42:32 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)