Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Kumari Sharda vs State Of Bihar on 18 June, 2025
SLP(Crl.) No.8934/2025
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.12 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.8934/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-04-2025
in CRLM No. 20637/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Patna]
KUMARI SHARDA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s)
(IA No. 144156/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT, IA No. 144158/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 18-06-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
(PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAYS BENCH)
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR
Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Lara Siddiqui, Adv.
Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Siddiqui, Adv.
Mr. Satya Siddiqui, Adv.
Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Mohd. Tauheed, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the
material placed on record. The petitioner applied for the Central
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
CHANDRESH
Date: 2025.06.18
16:30:27 IST
Reason:
1
SLP(Crl.) No.8934/2025
Teacher Eligibility Test Examination. However, when the
examination was to be conducted, some other person impersonating
the petitioner was found attempting to appear on her behalf.
Apparently, the petitioner has tried to disrupt the process of
examination by engaging an impersonator to appear on her behalf in
the CTET Examination. Thus, we are not inclined to extend the
benefit of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
2. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed as being devoid
of merit.
3. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(CHANDRESH) (SAPNA BANSAL)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
2