Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Harendra Dara vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27221) on 16 June, 2025
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:27221]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7061/2025
Harendra Dara S/o Birbal Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ren P.s
Merta Road District Nagaur At Present Om Colony Luharpura
Makrana P.s Makrana District Didwana Kuchaman (Raj.) (Present
Judicial Custody District Jail Bhilwara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mangilal Vishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonu Manawat, P.p.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
16/06/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of
filing an application under Section 483 BNSS (Section 439 Cr.P.C.)
at the instance of accused- petitioner. The requisite details of the
matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 111/2024 2. Concerned Police Station Bijoliya 3. District Bhilwara 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 8/29 of the NDPS Act 5. Offences added, if any --
6. Date of passing of impugned order 30.05.2025
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that the
principal accused and other accused have already been
granted bail by this Court and the case of the present
petitioner is on better footing. No case for the alleged
(Downloaded on 18/06/2025 at 09:30:31 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27221] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7061/2025]
offences is made out against him and he has been made an
accused based on conjectures and surmises. His incarceration
is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at
hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-
petitioner.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record,
particularly, looking to the fact that the principal accused and
other accused have already been granted bail by this Court
and the case of the present petitioner is on better footing and
therefore, on the ground of parity and to maintain judicial
discipline and consistency, the bail may be granted. There is
high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude.
In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed
suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the
present matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483
BNSS (Section 439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered that
the accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be
enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to
the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance
(Downloaded on 18/06/2025 at 09:30:31 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27221] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7061/2025]
before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and
when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
158-AnilKC/-
(Downloaded on 18/06/2025 at 09:30:31 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)