Sheru vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 June, 2025

0
11

1. Delay condoned.

2. The petitioner herein stands convicted for the offences

punishable under Section 376(2)(g) and 342 of the Indian Penal Code

by the Trial Court. He was awarded sentence of life imprisonment

for the charge under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.

The conviction and

sentence awarded to the petitioner and the co-accused has been
15:57:29 IST
Reason:

confirmed by the High Court in appeal.

2

3. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by the

learned counsel for petitioner and after going through the impugned

judgment(s) and the evidence placed on record, we find that the

victim PW-1 has stood firm on her stand that she was ravaged and

sexually assaulted by three assailants including the petitioner

(one of the assailants was a minor). The testimony of the victim

is thoroughly corroborated by the evidence of the medical officer

PW-5 who has deposed that on medical examination of the victim

being carried out, there were severe marks of violence on her

private parts and a specific opinion was given that she had been

subjected to rape. In this back ground, we are not inclined to

interfere with the impudent judgment(s). The special leave

petition being devoid of merit is hereby dismissed.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here