Singh Ram vs State Of Haryana on 19 June, 2025

0
2

1. The petitioners herein seek pre-arrest bail in connection

with the FIR No.226 dated 22.09.2023.

2. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner(s) to argue

the matter.

Digitally signed by

3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the
15:59:15 IST
Reason:

FIR was lodged way back in the year 2023 and the police does

not require the custodial investigation to be carried out from

the petitioners herein.

4. A perusal of the record reveals that initially as

offences of lesser gravity were applied, the petitioners were

arrested and then released on bail by the learned Magistrate.

Subsequently, upon addition of the offences punishable under

Sections 325 and 307 IPC, the learned Magistrate granted

permission to the police to arrest the petitioners whereupon

they approached the Sessions Court and then the High Court for

grant of anticipatory bail. Such prayer has been turned down

by the High Court vide impugned order dated 26.02.2024.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here