Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Aniket Chauhan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27406) on 18 June, 2025
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:27406]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7183/2025
Aniket Chauhan S/o Naresh Chauhan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o
Harijan Basti, Ambamata, Haal Nada Khada, Ps Surajpole,
District Udaipur (Raj.) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail
Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohan Lal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh on behalf of
Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
18/06/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of
filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 BNSS at
the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the
matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 144/2025 2. Concerned Police Station Surajpole 3. District Udaipur 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 55, 111(2) (b), 111(3), 111(4) of BNS and Section 3/25, 25(7)(i), 25(6) of Arms Act 5. Offences added, if any Under Section 7(a), 7/25(1aa) of Arms Act
6. Date of passing of impugned 04.06.2025
order
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no
case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his
(Downloaded on 19/06/2025 at 10:11:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27406] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7183/2025]
incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in
the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the
accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based
on conjectures and surmises.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record. So also
considering the submission that the alleged act would not fall
within the category of an organized crime. There is high
probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In
light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable
to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present
matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439
Cr.P.C./483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the
accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be
enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to
the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance
before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and
when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
137-chhavi/-
(Downloaded on 19/06/2025 at 10:11:34 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)