Sajad Ahmad Sheikh vs Union Territory Of J&K And Ors on 6 June, 2025

0
2

Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

Sajad Ahmad Sheikh vs Union Territory Of J&K And Ors on 6 June, 2025

Author: Rahul Bharti

Bench: Rahul Bharti

      HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                     AT SRINAGAR



                        Bail App No. 138/2024


                                             Reserved On: 27thof March, 2025.
                                             Pronounced On: 6th of June, 2025.


Sajad Ahmad Sheikh
                                                           ... Petitioner(s)
                               Through: -
                        Mr S. S. Rizvi, Advocate.
                                  V/s
Union Territory of J&K and Ors.

                                                         ... Respondent(s)

Through: –

None.

CORAM:

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rahul Bharti, Judge

(JUDGMENT)

01. Heard.

02. Perused the Bail Petition, the Objections along with the

respective documents accompanying therewith.

03. The jurisdiction of this Court under section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023

[corresponding to section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

(Cr. P. C.), 1973 read with Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 has been solicited by
Bail App No. 138/2024

Page 2 of 8

the petitioner, acting through his brother, thereby seeking bail on

the ground of state of his ailing health while serving custody as an

under-trial in a criminal case pending before the Court of learned

Special Judge (NDPS Cases), Srinagar.

04. Police Station Chanapora, Srinagar came to register an

FIR No. 31/2024 on account of an alleged incident of 26th of

August, 2024 when during the course of Naka Checking set up at

Hamambal, Budshah Nagar, three persons alleged to be coming

from Mehjoor Nagar, Natipora towards Budshah Nagar came to

be intercepted and found to be carrying a bag in their possession.

Upon their apprehension, the said persons came to be identified as

(1) Aniket Kumar S/o Ashok Kumar R/o 233, Tilpata, Karanwas,

Dardi, Gautum Buddha Nagar, UP, (2) Shavan Kumar @ Aditya

S/o Pappal R/o 238 Tilpata, Karanwas, Dardi, Gautum Buddha

Nagar, UP and (3) the Petitioner herein.

05. During their alleged search, 36 numbers of alleged

contraband in the form of Codril-T (Codeine Phosphate) bottles

were recovered from the personal possession of Aniket Kumar,

one of the three accused persons so apprehended.
Bail App No. 138/2024

Page 3 of 8

06. This incident resulted in their booking under section 8/22

read with section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985.

07. During the course of investigation of the case, the

petitioner came to prefer a bail petition before the Court of Special

Judge (NDPS cases), Srinagar on 28th of September, 2024 on file

No. 347/2024 thereby seeking grant of bail in his favour on the

basis of his purported medical condition at that time reported to be

afflicting and affecting him.

08. During the pendency of the said bail application, final

Police Report (Challan) u/s 193 BNSS, 2023 is said to have been

presented on 28th of October, 2024 against all the three accused

persons.

09. In connection with the adjudication of the bail petition

so filed before the Special Judge (NDPS Cases), Srinagar, a

medical report related to the health condition of the petitioner was

sought from the Superintendent, Central Jail, Srinagar.

10. Thereafter, the Senior Medical Officer, Central Jail,

Srinagar came forward with requisite medical report dated 2nd of

November, 2024 which confirmed the fact that the petitioner
Bail App No. 138/2024

Page 4 of 8

suffers from T2DM (type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) on Insulin,

Hypertension and Headache. However, the complaint of chest

pain reported by the petitioner was examined to be normal with

advice for cardiology follow up in OPD.

11. On the basis of said medical report, the Court of

Special Judge (NDPS Cases), Srinagar found no good reason for

granting bail on medical ground in favour of the petitioner related

to his then stated medical condition which was being attended to

by the Jail Authorities as per medical protocol without any

deficiency in service in terms of medical treatment. Accordingly,

said bail application was rejected vide an order dated 13th of

November, 2024, whereupon the petitioner came forward with the

institution of the present Bail Petition before this Court on 19th of

November, 2024.

12. This Court invited a fresh medical status report related

to the petitioner which came to be submitted by the Station House

Officer (SHO), Police Station, Chanapora, Srinagar on 13th of

January, 2025 accompanied with Senior Medical Officer, Central

Jail, Srinagar’s communication No. SMOCJ/24/1140 dated 17th of

December, 2024 addressed to the Senior Superintendent, Central
Bail App No. 138/2024

Page 5 of 8

Jail, Srinagar related to the medical condition of the petitioner.

Part of the said report needs to be reproduced herein:

“On 25-11-2024, the above said inmate was
referred to Govt. super Specialty Hospital Sheerbagh,
Srinagar for cardiology follow up as advised. The
consultant cardiologist after examination advised
medication and CT Coronary Angiography dated
29/11/2024, the medication advised is provided to him
regularly in view of raised creatine consultant
cardiologist advised nephrology consultation. He was
referred for nephrology consultation of Govt. super
Specialty Hospital at Sheerbagh, Srinagar, the consultant
nephrologist after examination advised medication and
advised to wait for contrast study, then they redated him
on 04-12-2024 but due to non-availability of escort the
said procedure was not conducted, fresh date for the said
procedure may be fixed as soon as possible.”

13. When this Court examines the health report of the

petitioner, this Court cannot escape noticing the fact that the

petitioner is suffering a complication related to his kidney

functioning which of course is compounded by him being afflicted

with diabetic status and on that count the petitioner has a cause for

concern related to his medical well being and health.

14. The rigor in section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 in the matter of grant

of bail takes a back-seat when there is ground of health reason
Bail App No. 138/2024

Page 6 of 8

related to an accused under custody booked under the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 seeking

bail. In that scenario, it is section 439 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure (Cr.P.C.) [corresponding to section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023] which

provides for exercise of discretion by a given court either to grant

or refuse bail in favour of an ailing/sick accused person in

custody.

15. In the context of the present case when the petitioner is

now in custody for the last more than 10 months in running and

simultaneously bearing in mind that intervening health condition

of the petitioner has resulted in his examination by Nephrologist

Consultant confirming the fact of raised creatinine level of the

petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant indulgence in granting a

duration bail in favour of the petitioner. Hence, a case is made out

for enabling the petitioner to get himself medically examined and

attended at his as well as his family’s expenses and efforts in any

of the best medical establishment of the Union Territory of Jammu

& Kashmir corresponding to his affordability to check any further

aggravation of his kidney related malfunctioning which in the

state of being in confinement and custody is likely to suffer a
Bail App No. 138/2024

Page 7 of 8

neglect in one form or the other notwithstanding an assurance

from the Jail Authorities that the petitioner would be duly attended

to receive due medical attention.

16. Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid facts and

circumstances of the case, this Court grants a duration bail of four

months in favour of the petitioner from the date of his release

from the Central Jail, Srinagar subject to the terms and conditions

as may be deemed appropriate to be imposed by the Court of

Special Judge (NDPS Cases), Srinagar. This Court is granting

duration bail in favour of the petitioner for a period of four months

by reserving discretion in favour of the trial court to consider

extension of the bail in favour of the petitioner only upon fresh

evaluation of the medical condition of the petitioner, as may come

to be reported by the petitioner on the basis of his medical record

of the period of four months for which he is being enlarged on bail

on the basis of indulgence by this Court. The trial court not to be

influenced by any observations made by this Court in this order in

the matter of considering extension or refusal of extension of bail

in favour of the petitioner.

17. Disposed of.

Bail App No. 138/2024

Page 8 of 8

18. Copy of this order to be forwarded by Registrar

Judicial, Srinagar to the Court of Special Judge (NDPS Cases),

Srinagar for setting terms and conditions of bail for period of four

months.

(Rahul Bharti)
Judge
SRINAGAR
6th of June, 2025
“TAHIR”

i. Whether the Judgment is approved for reporting? Yes/ No.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here