Cm No. 3656/2025 vs Ut Of J&K And Others on 23 June, 2025

0
2

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Cm No. 3656/2025 vs Ut Of J&K And Others on 23 June, 2025

                                                                                2025:JKLHC-JMU:1504
                                                                        Serial No. 15

     HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                                  AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1580/2025
CM No. 3656/2025, 3657/2025

Residents of Village Dreari Th.                    .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Shafait Hussain


                       Through: Mr. Rohit Verma, Advocate
                 vs
UT of J&K and others                                             ..... Respondent(s)
                       Through: Mr.

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
                                   ORDER

23.06.2025

ORAL

CM No. 3656/2025

1. This is an application seeking permission of this Court to file the

present writ petition in a representative capacity.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the

instant application is accordingly disposed of.

WP(C) No. 1580/2025

3. Residents of Village Dreari, Tehsil Manjakote have invoked writ

jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, commanding respondent No. 3 to demarcate the subject land

and evict the illegal encroachers therefrom within a time frame.

4. Case of the petitioners is that certain persons/residents of District

Rajouri have encroached upon the State land measuring about 380

Kanals, falling under Survey Nos. 664 (94 Kanals), 664/2 (58 Kanals)
2 WP(C) No. 1580/2025

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1504

and 664/1 (19 Kanals and 10 Marlas) within the revenue village

Dreari, Tehsil Manjakote. It is further case of the petitioners that

Principal, Government Middle School, Palyal, District Rajouri also

wrote to respondent No. 4 with respect to the concerted attempts made

by the said persons to encroach upon the school land, but no action in

this regard was taken. Petitioners are stated to have moved various

applications to respondents No. 2 and 4 for demarcation of the State

land.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners will

be satisfied, in case respondents, at the first instance, are directed to

demarcate the State land.

6. Having regard to the limited nature of controversy and innocuous

prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition

is allowed and respondents No. 2 and 3 are directed to demarcate the

State land within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy

of this order is made available.

7. Disposed of.

(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE

Jammu
23.06.2025
Vishal Sharma
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here