Manoj Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 20 June, 2025

0
4


Patna High Court – Orders

Manoj Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 20 June, 2025

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37270 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2017 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Manoj Sah Son of Kailash Sah Resident of Village- Hariharpur, P.S.-
                 Madhuban, District- East Champaran

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Aditya Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-06-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 151 of 2017 for the

offence under Sections 188, 143, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324,

325, 353, 307, 504, 506 and 120(B) of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution story, due to the accidental

death of a boy, the petitioner and other co-accused persons

numbering 200-300 obstructed the traffic and created problem

of law and order. They also assaulted the police party with lathi,

danda, brick etc. and tried to snatch firearms from the police

personnel who received injuries in this assault.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37270 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025
2/3

case by the local police on the instance of his enemies. From

perusal of F.I.R. itself, it is apparent that the petitioner was

neither apprehended at the spot nor any material was recovered

from his conscious possession. Petitioner is man of means and

there is no chance of his absconding and tampering with the

evidence. Learned counsel further submits that one of co-

accused namely Pramod Sah has been granted bail in Cr. Misc.

No. 32019 of 2025 vide order dated 20.05.2025 by a Co-

ordinate Bench of this Court and two other co-accused persons

namely, Birju Chaudhary and Jagdev Chaudhary have been

granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 23026 of 2025 vide order dated

30.04.2025 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is

inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the fate of

receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the

satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, East Champaran,

Motihari, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 151 of

2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37270 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025
3/3

438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned

Trial Court.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
Ankit Kumar/-

U      T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here