Patna High Court – Orders
Naveen Kumar Sharma @ Naveen Sharma vs The State Of Bihar on 24 June, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30466 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2023 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna
======================================================
NAVEEN KUMAR SHARMA @ NAVEEN SHARMA Son of Sri Arun
Sharma R/o Vill.- Shivgarh, P.S.- Bikram, District - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shrinandan Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate
Mr.Kumar Sameer, Advocate
Mr.Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pranav Kumar, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
3 24-06-2025
Heard Mr. Shrinandan Prasad Singh learned
Senior Counsel for the petitioner assisted by Mr. Kumar
Sameer, learned Advocate and learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for
the offences under Sections 341, 342, 147, 148, 149,
354(B), 452, 307, 448, 379, 323, 325, 380, 504, 506 of
I.P.C. and Section 27 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, an FIR was lodged
stating therein that the named accused persons including the
petitioner along with ten persons came variously armed and
assaulted the informant. They also misbehaved with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30466 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025
2/4
informant and subsequently, she was pushed and thrown on
ground. It is further alleged that they took away a gold
chain and a mobile phone and then fled away firing gun
shots.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has falsely been implicated in this false and
concocted case. Learned counsel further submits that no
such incident as alleged had occurred and from perusal of
the FIR, it would be evident that the petitioner is the
brother-in-law (devar) of the informant and on account of
some family dispute, the present case has been lodged.
Learned counsel next submits that from perusal of the
injury report it appears that though the injury was of
grievous nature, the same is on non-vital part of the body. It
is lastly submitted that the petitioner has three criminal
antecedents and is in custody since 10.12.2024.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and the submits
that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and
others to have assaulted the informant and also snatched
away the gold chain.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30466 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025
3/4
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and
circumstances of the case and taking into account the period
of custody, let the petitioner above-named be enlarged on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is
pending/successor court in connection with Bikram P.S.
Case No. 383/2023 subject to the conditions :-
a. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be
his close relative.
b. The petitioner shall remain physically
present in Court on each date of the trial.
c. In case of absence on two consecutive
dates or in violation of the terms of the bail,
the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable
to the cancelled by the court concerned.
d. The Court below shall verify the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has
concealed his criminal antecedent, the court
below shall take step for cancellation of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30466 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025
4/4bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the
afore-mentioned order shall not be delayed
for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
7. It is made clear that the observations, if any,
made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.
(Sourendra Pandey, J)
tusharika/-
U T