Ramswaroop vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28001) on 27 June, 2025

0
3


Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Ramswaroop vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28001) on 27 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:28001]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7523/2025

1.       Ramswaroop         S/o          Saktaram,     Aged         About   30   Years,
         Resident Of Danwara, Tehsil Bawdi, District Jodhpur
         (Lodged In Sub Jail, Nohar Dist. Hanumangarh)
2.       Mohanram S/o Bhanwarram, Aged About 28 Years,
         Resident Of Govindpura, Tehsil Bawdi District Jodhpur.
         (Lodged In Sub Jail, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh)
                                                                       ----Petitioners
                                          Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                      ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Budha Ram Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP assisted by
                                     Mr. Omprakash Choudhary



     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA

(VACATION JUDGE)

Order

27/06/2025

The present bail application has been preferred by the

petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) in

connection with FIR No.369/2025 registered at Police Station

Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under

Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further

submitted that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity

and there are no other criminal antecedents against the present

petitioner except the present one. The accused-petitioners are in

judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long

(Downloaded on 27/06/2025 at 10:28:31 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:28001] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7523/2025]

time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be

enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

application.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances

of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused

petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.).

5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 of

BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is directed that

petitioners (1) Ramswaroop S/o Saktaram & (2) Mohanram S/o

Bhanwarram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR

No.369/2025 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District

Hanumangarh provided each of them executes a personal bond in

a sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his

appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing

and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA (VACATION JUDGE)),J
107-GKaviya/-

(Downloaded on 27/06/2025 at 10:28:31 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here