Sonu Singh Sukha @ Sonu Singh @ Sukha @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 4 July, 2025

0
3


Patna High Court – Orders

Sonu Singh Sukha @ Sonu Singh @ Sukha @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 4 July, 2025

Author: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad

Bench: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3624 of 2024
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2024 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR District-
                                                         Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Sonu Singh Sukha @ Sonu Singh @ Sukha @ Shivam Kumar, Son of Sohan
                 Singh @ Sanjeev Singh, Resident of Village - Cheriya Bariarpur, P.S.-
                 Cheriya Bariarpur, District - Begusarai
                                                                      ... ... Appellant
                                                     Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Binod Paswan, Son of Kamli Paswan, Resident of Village - Cheriya
                  Bariarpur, Ward No.2, P.S. - Cheriya Bariarpur, District - Begusarai
                                                                              ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant       :       Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr. Binay Krishna, Special PP
                 For the Resp No. 2      :       Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

5   04-07-2025

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned

counsel for the informant and learned Special PP for the State.

2. This matter has been taken up on mentioning made

by learned counsel for the appellant with the consent of learned

counsel for the informant and learned Special PP for the State

on the ground that the appellant is required to appear in a

competitive examination being held by the Bihar Technical

Service Commission.

3. Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the

appellant has placed before this Court a copy of the admit card

to show that the examination is scheduled for 09th July, 2025.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3624 of 2024(5) dt.04-07-2025
2/5

4. In the circumstances, this matter has been taken up

for consideration.

5. The present appeal has been filed for setting aside

the order dated 14.06.2024 passed by learned Exclusive Special

Judge, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, Begusarai (in short ‘SC/ST (POA) Act’) in

connection with Cheria Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024 for

the offences under Sections 323, 341, 307, 504, 506/34 of the

Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(va) of the

SC/ST (POA) Act whereby and whereunder the prayer of the

appellant for bail has been rejected. He is in custody since

30.05.2024. He has three criminal antecedents.

6. Earlier, this appellant had moved this Court for

grant of anticipatory bail vide Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 2151 of

2024 which was permitted to be withdrawn on behalf of this

appellant vide order dated 04.06.2024.

7. From the allegations made in the FIR, it appears

that one Banti Singh had called the son of the informant in his

hotel, he had abused him and threatened him. It is alleged that

when the son of the informant reached Vishwakarma Chauk,

Cheriya, Bariyarpur, then four persons caught hold of him and

took him to Aadhya Food Plaza, Cheriya Bariyarpur which is
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3624 of 2024(5) dt.04-07-2025
3/5

the hotel of Banti Singh and all of them allegedly assaulted him.

It is alleged that Banti Singh took the son of the informant to his

dera and tied him with a pole/khutta. At this stage, allegation

against this appellant is that he had made a video and all of the

accused persons were hurling abuses in the caste name and

while making video, they forcibly made him to drink wine.

8. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that so

far as this appellant is concerned, there is no specific allegation

of causing assault against him. He is said to have made a video,

further, the Doctor has found four injuries out of which three are

simple in nature and one is grievous but the same is not

attributed to the appellant.

9. It is further submitted that the appellant has

remained in jail for over one year, he is a young man, is

educated and for purpose of his livelihood, he is appearing in

competitive examination. The petitioner has got three criminal

antecedents but in all the cases, he is on bail.

10. Learned counsel for the informant and learned

Special Public Prosecutor for the State have submitted that this

appellant is one of the persons who were involved in the alleged

occurrence. It is submitted that though in the FIR, no specific

allegation of assault had been made against him but there is a
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3624 of 2024(5) dt.04-07-2025
4/5

composite allegation and according to the same, this appellant

had also participated in the alleged occurrence.

11. Having regard to the submissions noted

hereinabove and on taking into consideration the nature of

allegations against the appellant, the fact that he is in jail for

over one year in connection with this case and he has to appear

in a competitive examination which is scheduled to be held from

09th July, 2025, this Court sets aside the impugned order and

directs release of the appellant above-named on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Scheduled

Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,

Begusarai in connection with Cheria Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 43

of 2024, subject to the conditions under Section 437(3) Cr.PC.

12. And further condition that the court below shall

verify the criminal antecedent of the appellant and in case at any

stage it is found that the appellant has concealed his criminal

antecedent, the court below shall take steps for cancellation of

bail bond of the appellant. However, the acceptance of bail

bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be

delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3624 of 2024(5) dt.04-07-2025
5/5

13. And further condition that while being on bail, he

would not try to approach/contact the informant and his family

members.

14. He shall put appearance in course of trial on the

dates fixed in the matter and two regular defaults in putting

appearance in court without any cogent reason, his bail bond

shall be cancelled.

15. This appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
lekhi/-

U         T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here