(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao)
The present I.A. No. 1 of 2023 is filed to review the order
dated 30.01.2022 in I.A. No.2 of 2018 in W.A. No. 247 of 2018.
2. A few facts may be now noted to enable this Court to dispose
of the present petition:
3. The case of the writ petitioner in Writ Petition No: 17165 of
2015 is that he was granted Ryotwari Patta in an extent of Ac.
54.00 cents in Sy. No: 288/P, 482, 483, 484, (Khata No. 172) in
Pallam Village and an extent of Ac 11-00 in Sy No. 310 (Khata No.
45) in Chintalapalem Village, by the Assistant Settlement Officer on
14.12.1966 vide S.R. No: 369/15(1)/62KHT. To obtain loan from the
bank he took the records to the Bank on 20-04-2015 to submit the
same to the banker. While he is travelling from Chintalpalem to
Yerpedu he lost the same where the bank is located, even the
petitioner’s best efforts he is not able to trace the missed
documents, finally he lodged a report to the P.S. Yerpedu on
22.04.2015 informing the incident. While the investigation is
pending by the police, the bank has insisted the writ petitioner to
provide duplicate copies for processing the loan, then the petitioner
applied through mee-seva on 07.05.2015. As per the certificate
dated 07.05.2015, as provided by the mee-seva the petitioner’s
name was reflected in 1B and Adangal. When the banker insisted
to obtain all the documents afresh to process the loan, the Writ
Petitioner has again applied through me-seva on 12.06.2015.
However, to his shock and dismay, no information was available
regarding the survey numbers, and he was told that “Tahsildar
verification and approval” were necessary. In the said
circumstances, the petitioner left with no other alternative remedy
have approached this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of
India aggrieved by the action of the respondents in deleting the
name of the petitioner in the relevant revenue records, additionally
to direct the respondents to incorporate the name of the writ
petitioner in the revenue records with the above prayer.