[ad_1]
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Chetan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:29105) on 7 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:29105]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6800/2025
1. Chetan Singh S/o Girdhari Singh, Aged About 21 Years,
Resident Of Bheru Ka Naka, Kanuja, Police Station Bar,
District Beawar (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Jaitaran).
2. Parmeshwar Singh S/o Chandra Singh, Aged About 32
Years, Resident Of Khejadiya Ka Badiya, Jetpura, Police
Station Bar, District Beawar (At Present Lodged In Sub
Jail, Jaitaran).
3. Sabu Ram S/o Pabu Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident
Of Shivnathpura, Police Station Saket Nagar, District
Beawar (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Jaitaran)
4. Deva Ram S/o Laxman Ram, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Shivnathpura, Police Station Saket Nagar,
District Beawar (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Jaitaran).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Choudhary
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen, PP
For Complainant(s) : Mr. Gulam Moinuddin
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
07/07/2025
This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439
Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested
in connection with F.I.R. No.98/2025 registered at Police Station
Raipur, District Beawar, for offences under Sections 189(2),
126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 140(3), 309(6) and 109(1) of the BNS.
(Downloaded on 07/07/2025 at 10:01:13 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:29105] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6800/2025]
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public
Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant. Perused
the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case.
Learned counsel further submits that as per the injury report,
injury is not corroborated by the complainant. Learned counsel
submits that as per the injury report of Mohd. Yakub it is
specifically mentioned “there is no any obvious injury seen all over
body at persent”. Learned counsel further submits that the
charge-sheet has already been filed in this matter. Learned
counsel submits that the petitioners are in judicial custody and the
trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the
benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned
counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail
application.
Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of the case; considering the record, more
specifically the injury report given by the Medical Officer, without
expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court
is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners
(1) Chetan Singh S/o Girdhari Singh, (2) Parmeshwar
Singh S/o Chandra Singh, (3) Sabu Ram S/o Pabu Ram and
(4) Deva Ram S/o Laxman Ram, arrested in connection with
(Downloaded on 07/07/2025 at 10:01:13 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:29105] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6800/2025]
F.I.R. No.98/2025 registered at Police Station Raipur, District
Beawar, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case,
provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-
and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of
learned trial court, for their appearance before that court on each
& every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till
completion of the trial.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
92-Hanuman/-
(Downloaded on 07/07/2025 at 10:01:13 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_2]
Source link