Md. Isha vs The State Of Bihar on 4 July, 2025

0
31

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

Sessions Trial No. 173 of 2024 arising out of Phulparas P.S.

Case No. 226 of 2020, lodged on 26.05.2020, under Sections

147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 323, 307, 380, 427, 504 & 506 of the

Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

bail application of the petitioner was considered and allowed

vide order dated 09.11.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70755 of

2023, whereby the petitioner was granted bail after framing of

charge and upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees

Thirty Thousand). At the time of granting bail, several

conditions were imposed upon the petitioner, one of which was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28545 of 2025(2) dt.04-07-2025

that if nine criminal cases were found pending against him, he

would be released on bail, but if more than nine cases were

found pending, he would not be released. It is further submitted

that at the time of furnishing the bail bond, the informant

brought to the notice of the authorities that there are more than

nine criminal cases are pending against the petitioner. Therefore,

it is alleged that the petitioner made a false statement before this

Court by claiming that only nine cases were pending against

him.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here