Raj Lakshmi Mishra vs The State Of Bihar on 9 July, 2025

0
44

[ad_1]

under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act,

whereupon learned court below restrained the petitioners

from withdrawing any amount from the insurance company

against the death claim of her husband of O.P. No. 2. In the

meantime, the loan account became NPA resulting in the

accumulation of debt manyfold, and finally, the house, which

was purchased, was auctioned by the bank.

7. It is further submitted by Mrs. Jha that O.P. No. 2

was at no point in time, in a domestic relation with the

petitioners, and no complaint was ever raised by her against

the petitioners since her marriage with the late Brajesh Mishra

in the year 2016. It is pointed out that the present case under

the D.V. Act was preferred only qua the claim of LIC Policy

No. 846938124, where petitioner no. 2 and O.P. No. 2 are

nominees. It is submitted that the dispute is purely civil in

nature, for which separate legal remedies are available under

the law, for which the present prosecution under the D.V. Act
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14357 of 2024 dt.09-07-2025

is completely a malicious approach out of ulterior and oblique

motives.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here