Harish Kumar @ Sachin And Anr vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 10 July, 2025

0
17


Harish Kumar @ Sachin And Anr vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 10 July, 2025


Delhi High Court

Harish Kumar @ Sachin And Anr vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 10 July, 2025

                          $~82
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                                            Date of Decision: 10.07.2025
                          +      CRL.M.C. 4490/2025
                                 HARISH KUMAR @ SACHIN AND ANR                        .....Petitioners
                                                    Through:      Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advocate.

                                                    versus

                                 STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR                           .....Respondents
                                                    Through:      Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State
                                                                  with SI Madan Lal, PS IGI Airport
                                                                  and SI Mamta, PS Dabri.


                                 CORAM:          JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

                          JUDGMENT             (ORAL)

1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 697/2017 of PS Dabri for
offence under Section 323/354B/506/509/34 IPC on the ground that the
complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with
the petitioners.

2. Learned APP for State accepts notice. Respondent no.2 (identified by
IO/SI Madan Lal) also accepts notice.

3. I have spoken with both the sides in Hindi. It is submitted by them
that petitioner no.2 has been wrongly described as the wife of petitioner no.1

CRL.M.C. 4490/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages
Digitally signed by GIRISH
Signature Not Verified GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA
Date: 2025.07.10 17:43:40 +05’30’

Digitally Signed
By:NEETU N NAIR
Signing Date:10.07.2025
18:16:34
whereas she is the landlady of petitioner no.1. It is stated by respondent no.2
that under the influence of liquor, there was a quarrel between petitioner
no.1 and her now deceased brother and in the said quarrel petitioner no.2
tried to intervene, which led to the registration of the impugned FIR.
Respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of
petitioners and they have settled the disputes amicably.

4. Having spoken with both the sides, I am satisfied that it would be in
the interest of justice to not to push them through trial. Therefore, the
petition is allowed and FIR No. 697/2017 of PS Dabri for offence under
Section 323/354B/506/509/34 IPC and proceedings arising out of the same
are quashed.

Digitally signed by

                                                                           GIRISH    GIRISH KATHPALIA
                                                                           KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.10
                                                                                     17:43:55 +05'30'

                                                                               GIRISH KATHPALIA
                                                                                    (JUDGE)
                          JULY 10, 2025/DR




                          CRL.M.C. 4490/2025                                          Page 2 of 2 pages
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:NEETU N NAIR
Signing Date:10.07.2025
18:16:34

Now Is the Time to Think About Your Small-Business Success

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Program Will Lend $10M to Detroit Minority Businesses

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Kansas City Has a Massive Array of Big National Companies

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...