[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Ramayan Sahni @ Ramkaran Sahni vs The State Of Bihar on 9 July, 2025
Author: Anshuman
Bench: Anshuman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42381 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2016 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran
======================================================
Ramayan Sahni @ Ramkaran Sahni Son of Ramlakhan Sahni Resident of
village - Lahladpur, P.S.- Madhuban, District - East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 09-07-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection
with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 87 of 2016 lodged on 26.07.2016,
for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 144,
153A, 153B, 295(A), 297, 353, 505, 452, 380, 307, 323, 324,
431, 341, 342, 427, 188, 337 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code
read with section 27 of the Arms Act and sections 3 & 4 of the
Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984 pending in
the Court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, East
Champaran, Motihari.
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42381 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025
2/3
79 named accused persons and more than 1000 unknown
persons. It has been alleged in the FIR that a large number of
people holding weapons in their hands had gathered and they
were damaging the public property and firing at mosque in the
village and they were also committing loot at nearby shops.
Thereafter, when the police party and local administration tried
to pacify the matter, the gathered people scuffled with them and
damaged the government vehicles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel
submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against all
the accused persons. Counsel submits that the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner is not clean as there are 13 cases
pending against him and only due to this reason at the instance
of police, name of the petitioner has been inserted in this case.
Counsel submits that petitioner is on bail in all the 13 cases
pending against him.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner and submits that criminal antecedent of the
petitioner is not clean as there are 13 cases pending against him
which indicates that the petitioner used to involve in such type
of activities and this aspect must be taken into consideration.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42381 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025
3/3
6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is
not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the
prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected
with liberty that if, petitioner surrenders before the Trial Court
within a period of 4 weeks from today then in that case, the Trial
Court is directed to pass order on his surrender-cum-bail
application on the same day, without being prejudice that the
anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court
and the Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link