Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Satyanarayan S/O Chunni Lal Saini vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:25279) on 9 July, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:25279]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2251/2025
Satyanarayan S/o Chunni Lal Saini, R/o 87, Hanuman Enclave, Ganga
Vihar, Bindayaka, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt.
Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (West).
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Bindayaka, District
Jaipur (West).
—-Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2037/2025
1. Smt Neetu Kanwar W/o Devendra Singh, Resident Of Plot No
86, Hanuman Enclave, Ganga Vihar, Sirsi Mod, Police Station-
Bindayaka, Jaipur.
2. Devendra Singh Son Of Shri Arjun Singh, Resident Of Plot No
86, Hanuman Enclave, Ganga Vihar, Sirsi Mod, Police Station-
Bindayaka, Jaipur.
—-Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Satnarayan Saini Son Of Late Chunni Lal Saini, Aged About 47
Years, Resident Of Plot O. 87 Hanuman Enclave, Ganga Vihar,
Sirsi Mod, Police Station- Bindayaka, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun with
Mr. Balraj Singh Jadaun (In SBCRLMP
No.2037/2025)
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun &
Mr. Balraj Singh Jadaun (In SBCRLMP
No.2251/2025)
(Downloaded on 16/07/2025 at 10:00:09 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:25279] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2251/2025]
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
09/07/2025
In the instant bunch of petitions, vide order dated 19.05.2025,
Court has granted interim protection to the petitioner(s) subject to
joining investigation. Further, on 08.05.2025 in S.B. Criminal
Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2037/2025 similar interim protection was
granted by the Court in favor of the petitioner(s).
Considering the factual matrix of the matter and taking note of
the fact that matter pertains to a financial transaction qua real estate,
directions were passed to conduct inquiry in the instant matter in
accordance with law including the provisions of Income Tax Act as
enunciated in The Correspondence RBANMS Education Institution
Vs. B. Gunashekar & Anr., Civil Appeal No.5200/2025.
When the matter is called, learned counsel for the State has
furnished a factual report and has submitted that investigation is
ongoing in the instant matter and genuineness of transaction is under
evaluation.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court
deems it apposite to dispose of the present petitions with direction that
investigation be conducted in the instant matter by the concerned
Authorities. Further, no coercive action be taken qua both the parties. It
is made clear that the said interim protection is operational till filing of
conclusion by the concerned authority.
Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of. Pending
applications, if any, shall stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/59-60
(Downloaded on 16/07/2025 at 10:00:09 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link