[ad_1]
Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Chandra Infrastructure vs Aditya Birla Finance Limited on 3 July, 2025
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.13 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
TRANSFER PETITION(S)(CRIMINAL) NO(S).533/2025
CHANDRA INFRASTRUCTURE & ANR. PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LIMITED & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
(FOR ADMISSION
IA NO. 150266/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA NO. 150265/2025 - STAY APPLICATION)
Date : 03-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
(PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAYS BENCH)
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Pinku Singh, AOR
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.
For Respondent(s):
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Transfer of proceedings pending as Cr. Reg. Case
No.45492 of 2023 under Section 25 of the Payment and
Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (for short 2007 Act) is sought
from the Court of Special Judicial Magistrate, (N.I.Act
Cases) No-13, Jaipur Metropolitan-Second, Jaipur, Rajasthan
to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, South West
District, Dwaraka, New Delhi.
The case of the petitioners is that company’s head
Signature Not Verified
office is located within the territorial jurisdiction of
Digitally signed by
BORRA LM VALLI
Date: 2025.07.17
15:16:59 IST
Reason: Delhi and the loan transaction in respect of which ECS
mandate was given to credit the account of the complainant
1
took place within the territorial jurisdiction of Delhi,
therefore, the complaint should not have been filed at
Jaipur (State of Rajasthan).
Section 25(5) of the 2007 Act provides that provision
of Chapter XVII of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 shall
apply to dishonour of electronic funds transfer.
Section 142(2)(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 falls in Chapter XVII thereof. As per which, the place
where the collecting bank is, complaint can be lodged.
It appears from the complaint allegations that the
mandate for electronic funds transfer was given by the
petitioner for credit to the complainant’s account located
within the territorial jurisdiction of Jaipur Court.
In such circumstances, we do not find any
justification to accept the transfer prayer.
Accordingly, the Transfer Petition is dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed
of.
(B. LAKSHMI MANIKYA VALLI) (AVGV RAMU)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
2
[ad_2]
Source link
