Shashikant Kurre vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 14 July, 2025

0
7


Chattisgarh High Court

Shashikant Kurre vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 14 July, 2025

                                     1/5




             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                          MCRCA No. 1021 of 2025
 •   Shashikant Kurre, S/o Shri Siyaram Kurre, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
     Posted As Deputy Collector Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                  ... Applicant
                                    versus
 •   State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer C.G. ACB/EOW
     Raipur, Tehsil Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
                                                             ... Non-Applicant

         (Cause title taken from Case Information System)
                                Order Sheet


14/07/2025          Mr. Surfaraj Khan, counsel for the applicant.

                    Dr.    Saurabh Pande,        learned Deputy Advocate

              General for the State/non-applicant.

                       1.

This is the first anticipatory bail application

under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) filed by the

applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in

connection with Crime No.30/2025 registered

at Police Station C.G. ACB/EOW Raipur

(C.G.) for the offence punishable under
2/5

Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the IPC

r/w Section 7 (C) of Prevention of Corruption

Act, 1988.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on

23.04.2025, the Economic Offence Wings,

Raipur lodged FIR No.30/2025 against 8

persons and name of the present applicant

was also mentioned therein. The allegation

against the applicant is that the applicant who

was the then Tahsildar of Tahsil Abhanpur,

District Raipur (C.G.) passed certain orders

while acting as quasi judicial authority under

the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959

and split/divided the lands and its khasra

numbers for facilitating the land oustees to

receive higher compensation in respect of

those lands which were acquired by the Land

Acquisition Authority/Officer for construction of

National Highway (Bharatmala Project).

3. Counsel for the applicant submitted that the

identically situated co-accused has

approached this Court for grant of anticipatory
3/5

bail in MCRCA No.946/2025 (Lekh Ram

Dewangan Versus State of Chhattisgarh) and

this Court, on 01.07.2025, has passed an ad-

interim order staying his arrest in view of the

order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

SLP No.9127/2025. Hence the present

applicant may also be granted the same

interim relief, as has been granted to the co-

accused and prays that the present case may

also be connected with MCRCA No.946/2025.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the

non-applicant/State pointed out that the

proclamation has been made on 28.06.2025,

wherein co-accused Lakheshwar Prasad had

been directed to appear before the trial Court

on 29.07.2025. Relying upon the judgment of

the Apex Court in the matter of State of

Madhya Pradesh vs Pradeep Sharma,

reported in (2014) 2 SCC 171, he states that

the applicant is not entitled for the anticipatory

bail in view of the proclamation being issued,

but the counsel for the applicant submitted
4/5

that though the proclamation has been issued

under Section 84 of BNSS Act, 2023 and the

applicant has to appear on 29.07.2025, but in

view of Section 84 (1) of B.N.S.S., the

applicant/accused has one month time to

appear before the authority concerned from

the date on which a proclamation has been

issued under Section 84 of B.N.S.S. and the

applicant would undertake to appear on

29.07.2025 before the concerned trial Court in

view of the proclamation issued, hence the

present applicant be granted same interim

relief, as has been granted to the identically

situated co-accused person.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties

and perused the material available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of

the case and further the fact that since the

other co-accused in MCRCA No.946/2025 has

already been granted the ad-interim relief,

therefore, the present applicant is also entitled

to get the same relief as he undertakes to
5/5

appear before the Court concerned on the

said date. Therefore, purely as an interim

measure, it is directed that the applicant shall

not be arrested in connection with Crime

No.30/2025 registered at Police Station C.G.

ACB/EOW Raipur (C.G.) for the offence

punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471,

120-B of the IPC r/w Section 7 (C) of

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 till the next

date of hearing.

8. Let this matter be listed along with MCRCA

No.946/2025.

9. Meanwhile, the State counsel may file its

reply.

SD/-

(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice

Digitally
DEEPTI signed
by
JHA DEEPTI
NIRALA JHA
NIRALA



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here