Anil vs State Of Kerala on 17 July, 2025

0
30

The accused Nos. 1 to 4 in S.C.No.407/2005 on the file

of the Additional Sessions Court (Adhoc I), Pathanamthitta,

have preferred this appeal challenging the judgment of

conviction and the order of sentence passed against them for

the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, and 326 r/w

34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows;

​ The accused, CW1 and CW2, were initially followers of

the CPI(M), a political party. Subsequently, accused severed

their association with CPI(M) and joined another political party

named KDP. CW1 later contested in a local body election under

the banner of CPI(M), and consequently, the accused

developed animosity towards CW1 and CW2. While so, on

09.01.2002 at 1.15 p.m., CW1 and CW2 came in an

autorikshaw driven by CW3 and stopped near a rice mill at

Mamoodu. Thereafter, CW2, after alighting from the

autorikshaw, went to a nearby shop. Then the accused Nos. 1

to 4, in furtherance of their common intention, encircled the
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

2025:KER:5285

autorikshaw in which CW1 was sitting. The 1st accused then

caught hold of the hair of CW1 and pulled him out of the

autorikshaw and hacked him with a sword stick, causing

injuries to his right palm and fingers. Then the 2nd accused

hacked at the rib portion of CW1 using a sword stick, and the

3rd accused struck CW1 on his hand with another sword stick.

Meanwhile, the 4th accused hit on the back and neck of CW1

with a stone. When CW3, the driver of the autorikshaw,

attempted to intervene and asked the accused not to assault

CW1, the accused Nos. 2 to 4 beat him with their bare hands.

Upon seeing the same when CW2 rushed to the spot, the 2nd

accused hacked at his chin with a sword stick. Moreover, the

4th accused struck CW2 on the right side of his face using a

stone, causing fracture of mandible. Thereafter, accused Nos.

1, 2, and 4 restrained CW2 and threatened him not to disclose

the same to anybody, and the 3rd accused caught hold of the

tongue of CW2 and inflicted a cut injury on it. Hence, the

accused are alleged to have committed the offences punishable

under Sections 341, 324, 326, and 307 r/w 34 of the IPC.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here