Seema Agarwal vs Ashok Chaudhry on 17 July, 2025

0
25

This is an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure,

1908 (in short ‘CPC’) filed by the sole defendant in a suit for recovery of money
said to have been lent and advanced. The defendant has attacked the plaint

mainly on three following grounds:-

i) According to the averments in the plaint the money provided to

the defendant is spread over several years i.e. between 2009 and

2016. The last amount was advanced in 2016. Each

disbursement, according to the defendant, amounts to separate

transaction and cannot be said to be part of a single transaction

on the basis of the averments in the plaint. The defendant also

says that the plaint is silent as to when the money given as loan is

to be returned. It only speaks of payment of interest after each

four months. The money which has been lent prior to 2016 on

having not been repaid is clearly hit by the provisions of

Limitation Act, 1963 since they are separate and independent

transaction. The plaintiff cannot claim recovery of such amount;

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here