Deepak Yadav vs State Of Raj And Ors (2025:Rj-Jp:26449) on 16 July, 2025

0
38


Deepak Yadav vs State Of Raj And Ors (2025:Rj-Jp:26449) on 16 July, 2025


Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Deepak Yadav vs State Of Raj And Ors (2025:Rj-Jp:26449) on 16 July, 2025

Author: Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal

                                   [2025:RJ-JP:26449]

                                           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                       BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                                     S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5848/2017

                                    Deepak Yadav Son Of Shri Bholaram Yadav, aged 40 years,
                                    resident of Todi Harmada Police Station Harmara District Jaipur
                                    At Present Sub-Inspector (Police Line) Alwar Rajasthan
                                                                                                            ----Petitioner
                                                                           Versus
                                    1.         State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Government
                                               Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan
                                    2.         The Principal Secretary Department Of Home Affairs,
                                               Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan
                                    3.         Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter,
                                               Lal Kothi, Jaipur Rajasthan
                                    4.         Inspector    General        Of      Police,      Jaipur     Renj,   Jaipur
                                               Rajasthan.
                                                                                                         ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Pareek for
Mr. Anoop Pareek
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Judgment / Order

16/07/2025

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this civil writ

petition is rendered infructuous.

The civil writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending

application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Manish/79

(Downloaded on 17/07/2025 at 10:08:34 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Now Is the Time to Think About Your Small-Business Success

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Program Will Lend $10M to Detroit Minority Businesses

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Kansas City Has a Massive Array of Big National Companies

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...