Heard Sri N. Subba Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the
Petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for Respondents.
2. Learned Senior Counsel would contend that, the 1st respondent who
received the complaint, has forwarded the same for appropriate action to the
3rd respondent herein. Then the 3rd respondent said to have been conducted
a detailed investigation through its Anti Ragging Committee (ARC) issued
office order dated 01.07.2025, which is contrary to its own regulations and
principles of natural justice.
3. He further asserts that the so called investigation by ARC is contrary to
regulation No.23 of National Medical Commission (Prevention and Prohibition
of Ragging in Medical Colleges and Institutions) Regulations, 2021 (NMC), as
no notices were served and no enquiry was conducted as contemplated. For
better understanding Regulation No.23 is extracted herein below:
[ad_1]
Source link