Dilkhush Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 July, 2025

0
26

Patna High Court – Orders

Dilkhush Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 July, 2025

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.326 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2024 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Dilkhush Kumar Son of Mahendra Chandara Yadav @ Mahendra Yadav
                 Resident of Village - Khaira Chanda, Ward No.-03, P.S. - Narpatganj, District
                 - Araria. Under the Guardianship of Mother Mrs. Prabha Devi, aged about 40
                 years, Wife of Mahendra Yadav @ Mahendra Chandra Yadav, Resident of
                 Village - Khaira Chanda, Ward No.-03, P.S. - Narpatganj, District - Araria.

                                                                                  ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :        Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   17-07-2025

The instant appeal under Section 101 (5) of the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

has been filed, assailing the order of rejection of bail by

Children’s Court on the ground that the CICL was charged

with the offence of POCSO Act and he required to be tried

under the said Act.

2. It is urged on behalf of the prosecution that

Section 34 of the POCSO Act lays down the procedure in case

of commission of offence by child and determination of his

age.

3. Section 34 of the POCSO Act runs thus: –

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

“34. Procedure in case of

commission of offence by child and

determination of age by Special Court.

(1) Where any offence under this

Act is committed by a child, such child shall

be dealt with under the provisions of 1[the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

Children) Act, 2015 (2 of 2016)].

(2) If any question arises in any

proceeding before the Special Court

whether a person is a child or not, such

question shall be determined by the Special

Court after satisfying itself about the age of

such person and it shall record in writing

its reasons for such determination.

(3) No order made by the Special

Court shall be deemed to be invalid merely

by any subsequent proof that the age of a

personas determined by it under sub-

section (2) was not the correct age of that

person.”

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

4. Thus, it is submitted on behalf of the prosecution

that if a child under the age of 18 years is an accused under

POCSO Act, the said Court under the POCSO Act is

empowered to adjudicate and decide the age of the accused in

the manner contemplated in the Juvenile Justice (Care and

Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and trial of such offence

shall be held by the said Court under POCSO Act.

5. This issue came up for consideration before the

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Thirumoorty v. State, represented

by the Inspector of Police, reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC

375. It is held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Paragraph 27

of the said judgment: –

“27. Thus, there is no escape from

the conclusion that even before the result of

investigation was filed, the fact regarding

the accused being a CICL was well known

to the Investigating Officer (PW-25), the

prosecution and the trial Court as well.”

6. The Hon’ble Apex Court next reproduced the

General principles to be followed in administration of the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

As laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court, Section 3 states

thus: –

“3. General principles to be

followed in administration of Act.– The

Central Government, the State

Governments, the Board, and other

agencies, as the case may be, while

implementing the provisions of this Act

shall be guided by the following

fundamental principles, namely:-

(i) Principle of presumption of

innocence : Any child shall be presumed to

be an innocent of any mala fide or criminal

intent up to the age of eighteen years.

(ii) Principle of dignity and

worth : All human beings shall be treated

with equal dignity and rights.

(iii) Principle of participation :

Every child shall have a right to be heard

and to participate in all processes and

decisions affecting his interest and the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

child’s views shall be taken into

consideration with due regard to the age

and maturity of the child.

(iv) Principle of best interest : All

decisions regarding the child shall be based

on the primary consideration that they are

in the best interest of the child and to help

the child to develop full potential.

(v) Principle of family

responsibility : The primary responsibility

of care, nurture and protection of the child

shall be that of the biological family or

adoptive or foster parents, as the case may

be.

(vi) Principle of safety : All

measures shall be taken to ensure that the

child is safe and is not subjected to any

harm, abuse or maltreatment while in

contact with the care and protection system,

and thereafter.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

(vii) Positive measures : All

resources are to be mobilised including

those of family and community, for

promoting the well-being, facilitating

development of identity and providing an

inclusive and enabling environment, to

reduce vulnerabilities of children and the

need for intervention under this Act.

(viii) Principle of non-

stigmatising semantics : Adversarial or

accusatory words are not to be used in the

processes pertaining to a child.

(ix) Principle of non-waiver of

rights : No waiver of any of the right of the

child is permissible or valid, whether

sought by the child or person acting on

behalf of the child, or a Board or a

Committee and any non-exercise of a

fundamental right shall not amount to

waiver.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

(x) Principle of equality and non-

discrimination : There shall be no

discrimination against a child on any

grounds including sex, caste, ethnicity,

place of birth, disability and equality of

access, opportunity and treatment shall be

provided to every child.

(xi) Principle of right to privacy

and confidentiality : Every child shall have

a right to protection of his privacy and

confidentiality, by all means and

throughout the judicial process.

(xii) Principle of

institutionalisation as a measure of last

resort : A child shall be placed in

institutional care as a step of last resort

after making a reasonable inquiry.

(xiii) Principle of repatriation and

restoration : Every child in the juvenile

justice system shall have the right to be re-

united with his family at the earliest and to
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

be restored to the same socio-economic and

cultural status that he was in, before

coming under the purview of this Act,

unless such restoration and repatriation is

not in his best interest.

(xiv) Principle of fresh start : All

past records of any child under the Juvenile

Justice system should be erased except in

special circumstances.

(xv) Principle of diversion :

Measures for dealing with children in

conflict with law without resorting to

judicial proceedings shall be promoted

unless it is in the best interest of the child

or the society as a whole.

(xvi) Principles of natural justice:

Basic procedural standards of fairness

shall be adhered to, including the right to a

fair hearing, rule against bias and the right

to review, by all persons or bodies, acting

in a judicial capacity under this Act.”
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

7. Section 9 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and

Protection of Children) Act, 2015 lays down the procedure to

be followed by a Magistrate who has not been empowered

under this Act. Section 9 runs thus: –

“9. Procedure to be followed by a

Magistrate who has not been empowered

under this Act.– (1) When a Magistrate,

not empowered to exercise the powers of

the Board under this Act is of the opinion

that the person alleged to have committed

the offence and brought before him is a

child, he shall, without any delay, record

such opinion and forward the child

immediately along with the record of such

proceedings to the Board having

jurisdiction.

(2) In case a person alleged to

have committed an offence claims before a

court other than a Board, that the person is

a child or was a child on the date of

commission of the offence, or if the court
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

itself is of the opinion that the person was a

child on the date of commission of the

offence, the said court shall make an

inquiry, take such evidence as may be

necessary (but not an affidavit) to

determine the age of such person, and shall

record a finding on the matter, stating the

age of the person as nearly as may be:

Provided that such a claim may

be raised before any court and it shall be

recognised at any stage, even after final

disposal of the case, and such a claim shall

be determined in accordance with the

provisions contained in this Act and the

rules made thereunder even if the person

has ceased to be a child on or before the

date of commencement of this Act.

(3) If the court finds that a person

has committed an offence and was a child

on the date of commission of such offence,

it shall forward the child to the Board for
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

passing appropriate orders and the

sentence, if any, passed by the court shall

be deemed to have no effect.

(4) In case a person under this

section is required to be kept in protective

custody, while the person’s claim of being a

child is being inquired into, such person

may be placed, in the intervening period in

a place of safety.

(emphasis supplied)

8. Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and

Protection of Children) Act, 2015 deals with the preliminary

assessment into heinous offences by Board, which runs

hereunder: –

“15. Preliminary assessment into

heinous offences by Board.– (1) In case

of a heinous offence alleged to have been

committed by a child, who has completed

or is above the age of sixteen years, the

Board shall conduct a preliminary

assessment with regard to his mental and
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

physical capacity to commit such offence,

ability to understand the consequences of

the offence and the circumstances in which

he allegedly committed the offence, and

may pass an order in accordance with the

provisions of subsection (3) of section 18:

Provided that for such an

assessment, the Board may take the

assistance of experienced psychologists or

psycho-social workers or other experts.

Explanation. –For the purposes

of this section, it is clarified that

preliminary assessment is not a trial, but is

to assess the capacity of such child to

commit and understand the consequences

of the alleged offence.

(2) Where the Board is satisfied

on preliminary assessment that the matter

should be disposed of by the Board, then

the Board shall follow the procedure, as far
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

as may be, for trial in summons case under

the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973:

Provided that the order of the

Board to dispose of the matter shall be

appealable under sub-section (2) of section

101:

Provided further that the

assessment under this section shall be

completed within the period specified in

section 14.”

9. Section 18 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and

Protection of Children) Act, 2015 speaks about orders

regarding child found to be in conflict with law. Section 18

runs as hereunder: –

“18. Orders regarding child

found to be in conflict with law.–(1)

Where a Board is satisfied on inquiry that a

child irrespective of age has committed a

petty offence, or a serious offence, or a

child below the age of sixteen years has

committed a heinous offence, then,
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

notwithstanding anything contrary

contained in any other law for the time

being in force, and based on the nature of

offence, specific need for supervision or

intervention, circumstances as brought out

in the social investigation report and past

conduct of the child, the Board may, if it so

thinks fit,-

(a) allow the child to go home

after advice or admonition by following

appropriate inquiry and counselling to such

child and to his parents or the guardian;

(b) direct the child to participate

in group counselling and similar activities;

(c) order the child to perform

community service under the supervision of

an organisation or institution, or a

specified person, persons or group of

persons identified by the Board;

(d) order the child or parents or

the guardian of the child to pay fine:

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

Provided that, in case the child is

working, it may be ensured that the

provisions of any labour law for the time

being in force are not violated;

(e) direct the child to be released

on probation of good conduct and placed

under the care of any parent, guardian or

fit person, on such parent, guardian or fit

person executing a bond, with or without

surety, as the Board may require, for the

good behaviour and child’s well-being for

any period not exceeding three years;

(f) direct the child to be released

on probation of good conduct and placed

under the care and supervision of any fit

facility for ensuring the good behaviour

and child’s well-being for any period not

exceeding three years;

(g) direct the child to be sent to a

special home, for such period, not

exceeding three years, as it thinks fit, for
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

providing reformative services including

education, skill development, counselling,

behaviour modification therapy, and

psychiatric support during the period of

stay in the special home:

Provided that if the conduct and

behaviour of the child has been such that, it

would not be in the child’s interest, or in the

interest of other children housed in a

special home, the Board may send such

child to the place of safety.

(2) If an order is passed under

clauses (a) to (g) of sub-section (1), the

Board may, in addition pass orders to-

(i) attend school; or

(ii) attend a vocational training

centre; or

(iii) attend a therapeutic centre;

or
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

(iv) prohibit the child from

visiting, frequenting or appearing at a

specified place; or

(v) undergo a de-addiction

programme.

(3) Where the Board after

preliminary assessment under section 15

pass an order that there is a need for trial

of the said child as an adult, then the Board

may order transfer of the trial of the case to

the Children’s Court having jurisdiction to

try such offences.”

10. Section 19 deals with the powers of the

Children’s Court, which runs as hereunder: –

“19. Powers of Children’s Court.–(1)

After the receipt of preliminary assessment from

the Board under Section 15, the Children’s Court

may decide that-

(i) there is a need for trial of the child

as an adult as per the provisions of the Criminal

Procedure Code, 1973 (2 of 1974) and pass
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

appropriate orders after trial subject to the

provisions of this section and Section 21,

considering the special needs of the child, the

tenets of fair trial and maintaining a child

friendly atmosphere;

(ii) there is no need for trial of the child

as an adult and may conduct an inquiry as a

Board and pass appropriate orders in accordance

with the provisions of Section 18.

(2)-(5)……….”

11. Thus it is held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in

Thirumoorthy (supra) that trial of a CICL shall be conducted

under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and

Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and not under the POCSO

Act.

12. In view of aforesaid decision passed by the

Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Court has no other alternative

but to hold that a CICL involved in a case under the POCSO

Act shall be dealt with either by the Juvenile Justice Board or

by the Children’s Court as per the provision of the Juvenile

Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

13. In view of the above decision, this Court takes up the

instant appeal for determination.

14. The appellant has prayed for bail on the ground that

he is a child, in accordance with the definition contained in

Section 2(12) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

Children) Act, 2015. Secondly, it appears from the evidence of

the victim girl that, on the date and time of the occurrence, she

was playing in her house when one Sonakshi called her and

took her to the house of the appellant. The appellant

committed some act as a result of which she sustained a

bleeding injury on her private part. When her grandmother

saw her, she was lying on a cot in the house of the appellant. It

is stated by the appellant that he was about 17 years and 21

days old on the date of the occurrence.

15. The learned Advocate for the appellant has also

produced the medical examination report of the victim. It is

ascertained from the said medical examination report that no

signs of sexual assault were found on the body of the victim,

but there might have been an attempt of sexual assault. The

case before the concerned Children’s Court is at the trial stage.

Most of the witnesses have been examined; therefore, I am not
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025

inclined to release the accused on bail at this stage. If he is

released on bail, the trial may be prolonged and delayed.

While rejecting the bail application of the appellant, the

concerned Children’s Court is specifically directed to dispose

of the case within three months from the date of

communication of this order.

16. Further, the appellant is at liberty to renew his prayer

for bail if the trial is not concluded within three months..

17. With the above order, the instant Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.

326 of 2025 is dismissed.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
Suraj Dubey/-

U      T
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here