Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Lal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:31658) on 18 July, 2025
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:31658]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IV Bail Application No. 3718/2025
Lal Singh S/o Beerbal Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village
Malganva, Post Aghara, Police Station Shayal, Dist. Oriya,
Utarpradesh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Bhilwara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikander Khan
For Respondent(s) : Mr. SS Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
18/07/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of
filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 BNSS at
the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the
matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 262/2001 2. Concerned Police Station Gulabpura 3. District Bhilwara 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 307, 394, 458, 392 of IPC Section 3/25 of Arms Act 5. Offences added, if any Under Section 411, 414, 216-A of IPC
6. Date of passing of impugned 11.03.2025
order
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no
case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his
incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in
the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the
(Downloaded on 22/07/2025 at 09:33:14 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:31658] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3718/2025]
accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based
on conjectures and surmises.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record. The
petitioner is under custody since 2024 February. Identification
parade has not been conducted yet. It is indeed a question to
ponder as to how the identity of petitioner can be established
as the assailant who inflected the injuries to the victim. There
is high probability that the trial may take long time to
conclude. In light of these facts and circumstances, it is
deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner
in the present matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439
Cr.P.C./483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the
accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be
enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to
the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance
before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and
when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
61-chhavi/-
(Downloaded on 22/07/2025 at 09:33:14 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link