Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Shafiulla @ Auto Shafi vs State Of Karnataka on 22 July, 2025
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(@ SLP(CRL.) No.5826/2025)
SHAFIULLA @ AUTO SHAFI APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF KARNATAKA RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. We have heard the learned Senior counsel
appearing for the appellant and the learned
counsel appearing for the State.
3. The appellant has been arraigned as an accused
in Crime No.111/2023 for the offences
punishable under Sections 504, 302 read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for
short, ‘IPC’).
4. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the
appellant submitted that the appellant has been
Signature Not Verified
under incarceration for a period of more than
Digitally signed by
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2025.07.23
18:12:10 IST 1½ years. The charges are yet to be framed as
Reason:
one of the co-accused has stated to be
1 SLP(CRL.) No.5826/2025
absconding.
5. It is further submitted that the alleged
occurrence has taken place in pursuant to an
accident between two cars.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the State
submitted that there is a specific overt act
attributed to the appellant. The co-accused is
absconding and that is the reason why the
matter is not proceeding further before the
trial Court. Considering the above, the
impugned order should not be interfered.
7. We are inclined to set aside the impugned order
as the appellant has been under incarceration
for more than 1½ years and there is no further
progress in the trial. Even as per the case of
the prosecution, the occurrence has happened in
pursuant to an accident. Therefore, the major
question will be whether the appellant is
liable to be charged under Section 304 Part-1
or under Section 302 of the IPC, as the case
may be.
8. Considering the above, we are inclined to set
aside the impugned order and grant bail to the
2 SLP(CRL.) No.5826/2025
appellant.
9. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set
aside and the appellant is granted bail,
subject to the terms and conditions that may be
imposed by the Trial Court.
10. The appeal is allowed, accordingly.
11. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
……………………………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]
………………………………………………………………………J.
[NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH]
NEW DELHI;
22nd JULY, 2025
3 SLP(CRL.) No.5826/2025
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-E
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
No(s). 5826/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
dated 29-01-2025 in CRLP No. 706/2025 passed by the
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]
SHAFIULLA @ AUTO SHAFI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF KARNATAKA Respondent(s)
Date : 22-07-2025 This petition was called on for
hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
For Petitioner(s) Mr. S N Bhat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. D P Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Tarun Kumar Thakur, Adv.
Mr. Abhay Choudhary M, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Ram R, Adv.
Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Prateek Chadha, A.A.G.
Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made
the following
O R D E R
Leave granted.
The relevant portion of the order reads as
under:-
‘Accordingly, the impugned
order stands set aside and the
appellant is granted bail,
subject to the terms and4 SLP(CRL.) No.5826/2025
conditions that may be imposed
by the Trial Court.’The appeal is allowed in terms of the
signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(Signed order is placed on the file)5 SLP(CRL.) No.5826/2025
[ad_1]
Source link
