Vikash Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 23 July, 2025

0
21

Patna High Court – Orders

Vikash Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 23 July, 2025

Author: Arun Kumar Jha

Bench: Arun Kumar Jha

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19937 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-416 Year-2023 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash Kumar S/O Raj Kumar Ray @ Bachcha Ray Resident of Village-
                 Madhaura, P.S- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Virendra Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   23-07-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

connection with Madhaura P.S. Case No.416 of 2023, registered

for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307,

379 and 504 of the IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and other

co-accused persons, who were armed with lathi, danda, daab,

sword and iron rod came to the doors of the informant and

started hurling abuses. When the informant forbade them from

doing so, he was assaulted by the petitioner and other co-

accused persons. When the brother of the informant intervened,

he was brutally assaulted by daab. The wife and son of the

informant were also assaulted, when they tried to save the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19937 of 2025(4) dt.23-07-2025
2/3

victims. The occurrence took place in the background of land

dispute.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been

falsely implicated in this case. Both sides are agnates and the

informant side is aggressor and the petitioner side has filed

Marhaura P.S. Case No. 417 of 2023 against informant side. It is

apparent that the present case has been lodged by the informant

to save his skin. There is no explanation of injury received by

the petitioner side. The learned counsel further submits that

injury reports of the victims mostly show simple injury except

injury of Dashrath Rai which is stated to be grievous. The

petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody

since 06.01.2025. Charge-sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the

submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

case and counter case between the parties and also considering

the clean antecedent of the petitioner, his period of custody and

submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner is directed to be

released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19937 of 2025(4) dt.23-07-2025
3/3

(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saran at

Chapra/concerned court in connection with Madhaura P.S. Case

No. 416 of 2023, subject to the condition laid down under

Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on

each and every date fixed by the court

below, if so required by the learned trial

court.

(iii) In case of absence on three

consecutive dates or in violation of the

terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Saurav/-

U      T
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here