[ad_1]
1. Heard learned counsel for revisionist; Ms. Manju Thakur, learned A.G.A-I, for State and perused the material on record.
2. No one has turned up on behalf of opposite party no. 2.
3. The present criminal revision has been filed challenging the impugned judgment / order dated 12.12.2023 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Kaushambi in Case Crime No. 412 of 2022 (State vs. Child in conflict with law ABCJU) and the impugned judgment / order dated 13.08.2024 passed by the learned POCSO Court / Special Judge (POCSO Act), Kaushambi in Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2024 (Raju Pal @ Ram Milan vs. State of U.P & others) on the ground that the impugned orders have wrongly held the revisionist to the tried as adult and his assessment by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as Special Court is not in accordance with law.
[ad_2]
Source link