the Defendant no. 1 requested the Plaintiff to allow him to occupy the flat
till death as a tenant on payment of monthly rent. Various correspondences between
the parties including the letter dated 15/11/2019 are annexed to the Affidavit-in-
Reply to substantiate the content that the Plaintiff asked the Defendants to vacate the
suit premises.
The Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff argued that although the plea of adverse
possession is there in the written statement, particulars required to establish adverse
possession are missing. Referring to Hemaji Waghaji Jat Vs. Bhikhabhai
Khengarbhai Harijan & Ors. [(2009) 16 SCC 517], Karnataka Board of
Wakf Vs. Government of India & Ors. [(2004) 10 SCC 779] that the
decisions of Supreme Court of India, Learned Counsel argued that particulars should
be furnished to substantiate the claim of adverse possession.