[ad_1]
Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Smt. Pooja Sharma Wife Of Shri Sharthak … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:26369) on 15 July, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:26369]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2043/2024
1. Smt. Pooja Sharma Wife Of Shri Sharthak Sharma, D/o Shri
Ramjilal Sharma, Resident Of 4/464, Near M.p.s. Schol, Sector
No. 4, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur City East (Raj). At Present
Resident Of 304, Keshar Kunj, Kanak Vihar, Kamla Nehru
Nagar, Keshopura, Bhankrota, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Raj.
2. Saurabh Sharma Son Of Shri Ramjilal, Resident Of 304, Keshar
Kunj, Kanak Vihar, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Keshopura, Bhankrota,
Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Smt. Anita Sharma Wife Of Shri Kailash Chand Sharma,
Resident Of 4/464, Near M.p..s Schol, Sector No. 4, Jawahar
Nagar, Jaipur City East (Raj). (Raj).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Daulat Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. GA
Mr. Satyam Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
15/07/2025
1. This petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is filed, with prayer to
quash the FIR No.335/2023 registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar,
District Jaipur City East for offences under Sections 325, 323, 341, 379,
427, 452, 457, 506, 384, 120-B, 34 of IPC, on the basis of compromise
effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se
dispute.
2. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the
parties without any coercion or influence have entered into a
compromise. Hence, both the parties have jointly agreed for quashing
(Downloaded on 26/07/2025 at 12:45:30 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26369] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2043/2024]
the impugned FIR and any further proceedings, arising therefrom.
Parties have marked their presence before the concerned Court.
3. Heard and considered.
4. At this juncture, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance
upon the dictum encapsulated in Jasmair Singh Vs. State of Haryana
[(2022) 9 SCC 73] and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012)
10 SCC 303], wherein, it is held that case was eminently suitable to be
considered for exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.PC for
quashing of criminal proceedings, if the parties have buried hatchet and
decided to give quietus to the proceedings, which were lodged inter se.
5. In view of legal proposition, laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court
in aforementioned cases, and considering the fact that the dispute deals
in personam and has amicably been settled between/by the parties, this
Court deems it appropriate to allow the present misc. petition. Hence,
the compromise is taken on record.
6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal
miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 335/2023 registered
at Police Station Jawahar Nagar, District Jaipur City East with all
consequential proceedings, is hereby quashed and set aside.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s),
if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/s-479
(Downloaded on 26/07/2025 at 12:45:30 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_2]
Source link