Srimati Sethy And Others vs Competent Authority & Land …. … on 18 July, 2025

0
21

[ad_1]

1. The Petitioners, through this Writ Petition, seek to challenge the Order

dated 19.03.2024 passed by the District Judge, Keonjhar in C.M.A. No.

01/2024 in Execution Case No. 75/2019 (arising out of Arbitration

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK

Award dated 24.11.2018 in Arbitration Misc. Case No. 13/2017 and

L.A. Case No. 79/2017), whereby the petition filed under Section 47

read with Order XXI Rules 97, 101 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908 was rejected.

2. The Petitioners, though admittedly not parties to the original

proceedings, are the legal heirs of the original landowners and have a

substantive interest in the land acquired under the National

Highways Act, 1956, specifically land notified under Section 3-A and

compensation determined under Section 3-G(5). The impugned Order

is alleged to have been obtained by fraud and misrepresentation,

excluding the Petitioners who are necessary parties with valid legal

rights.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here