Ganga G vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2025

0
18

Kerala High Court

Ganga G vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2025

BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

                                    1


                                                      2025:KER:54898

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN

        FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2025 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1947

                    BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

     CRIME NO.1085/2025 OF Kollam West Police Station, Kollam

PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED:

           GANGA G​
           AGED 54 YEARS​
           W/O. ROOPESH SREEMANGALAM, KUNNATHOOR WEST,
           KUNNATHOOREASTP.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 678103


           BY ADV SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEWS

RESPONDENT/STATE:

    1      STATE OF KERALA​
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
           ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2      DR. CHITH K. ARAVIND ​
           S/O K. ARAVINDAN, PANKAJ (H), S/26, SANKAR NAGAR,
           CHINNAKADA, KOLLAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT - IMPLEADED AS R2
           VIDE ORDER DTD 18-7-25 IN CRL MA 2/25

    3      G. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR ​
           (DEFACTO COMPLAINANT) S/O GOPALAN NAIR, PRESIDENT,
           KOLLAM COOPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD,
           Q-157THIRUMULLAVARAM. P. O -IMPLEADED AS R3 VIDE ORDER
           DTD 18-7-25 IN CRL MA 3/25

    4      DR. MANJU PRATHAP ​
 BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

                                2


                                                    2025:KER:54898

          W/O PRATHAP, SAMBHAVI (H), ASRAMAM, KOLLAM, KOLLAM
          DISTRICT -IMPLEADED AS R4 VIDE ORDER DTD 18-7-25 IN CRL
          MA 5/25


          BY ADVS. ​
          SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN​
          SHRI.ABDUL KHADER KUNJU S.​
          SHRI.A AL FAYAD​
          SRI.M.KIRANLAL​
          SRI.T.S.SARATH​
          SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA)​
          SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR​
          SMT.SAILAKSHMI MENON​
          SMT. AASHI K. SHAJAN​
          SHRI.RAVISANKAR C.R.​


OTHER PRESENT:

          SPL PP VACB RAJESH.A,SRPP VACB REKHA.S

     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION         ON
25.07.2025, THE COURT ON 25.07.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

                                  3


                                                       2025:KER:54898


                      A. BADHARUDEEN, J
            ============================
                      B.A. No. 8273 of 2025
           ==============================
                   Dated 25rd day of July 2025


                              ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail filed by the

petitioner in Crime No. 1085 of 2025, registered by the Kollam

West police station, alleging commission of offences punishable

under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 336(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhitha, 2023 (for short, ‘BNS’), and later offences are corrected

as under Sections 406, 420, and 468 of IPC on finding that the

offences were committed before April 2024.
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

4

2025:KER:54898

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned

Public Prosecutor, the learned counsel appearing for the de facto

complainant who is impleaded as the additional 2nd respondent,

and also the learned counsel for one of two beneficiaries got

impleaded as additional 3rd, and 4th respondents in this case by

allowing their petitions.

3. Reading the FIR, the prosecution allegation is that the

accused herein, who worked as the Secretary of Kollam

Co-operative Building Society Q157 (for short, ‘the Society’

hereinafter), obtained unlawful enrichment on getting deposits

from third parties for and on behalf of the Society, and

misappropriated the same without depositing the same in the
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

5

2025:KER:54898

Society. When the so-called persons demanded back their

money, the accused issued twelve cheques to those persons by

forging the signature of the President therein, who is the de facto

complainant in this case, and also by putting her signature since

the cheque of the Society would be honoured only when signed

by the President and Secretary. The amount misappropriated by

the petitioner as per the allegations in the FIR is Rs.70,74,500/-.

During the investigation, it was brought to the notice of the

Investigating Officer that apart from the IPC offences, offence

under Section 13(1) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption

(Amendment) Act, 2018, also is committed by the petitioner,

and accordingly the investigation is now going on inclusive of the
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

6

2025:KER:54898

above offences. Further request was given to the Vigilance to take

over the case.

4. While pressing for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner read over

various documents produced along with the Bail Application

and also the minutes of the Society including other documents

produced subsequently to contend that the Society has been

running in loss and the Society has been trailing to return the

money to the depositors. Accordingly, in order to pay the

amount to the depositors, deposits were collected from various

persons including the relatives of the Secretary and Director

Board Members. That apart, Rs.25 lakh was deposited by one
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

7

2025:KER:54898

Abhijith who expressed to deposit Rs.50 lakh on the condition

of providing a job for him in the Society. He pointed out further

that, as per the WhatsApp communication between the Secretary

and the President, copy of the same has been produced, various

loans were granted, and deposits were returned as instructed by

the President. According to the learned counsel for the

petitioner, as could be read out from the records produced, the

petitioner is bound to obey the instructions of the President, and

accordingly, she acted upon the instructions. The learned

counsel for the petitioner pointed out Section 106 of the

Cooperative Societies Act in this regard. It is submitted by the

learned counsel for the petitioner further that, in the instant case,
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

8

2025:KER:54898

none of the offences would attract against the petitioner, and if at

all, any involvement of the petitioner is found, the same could

not be found independently without the involvement of the de

facto complainant. Therefore, the de facto complainant also to

be made as an accused in the facts of the case.

5. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

petitioner is under treatment as per Annexure – A9 certificate

issued by Subash D, Orthopedic Junior Consultant, District

Hospital, Mavelikkara, and therefore, the medical condition of

the petitioner also may be considered, when considering her plea

for pre-arrest bail. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the

petitioner further that, if the petitioner is granted bail, then also
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

9

2025:KER:54898

she is ready to co-operate with the investigation, and no

substantial change if she would be detained in custody otherwise.

6. The learned counsel for the de facto complainant, who is

the President of the Society, argued that on 07.05.2025, the

petitioner, who was the Secretary, made an application seeking

leave for ten days with effect from 08.05.2025 and the same was

granted. After the expiry of leave, she did not turn up for

employment, and subsequent enquiry by the President revealed

that the accused obtained money from various persons on the

premise of depositing the same in the Society by issuing forged

certificate and receipts and thereby the accused

misappropriated Rs.70,74,500/- as the said amount found to be
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

10

2025:KER:54898

lacking as per the audit report. Thereafter, in order to discharge

the said liability, she issued twelve cheques by forging the

signature of the President, who is the de facto complainant in

this case. According to the learned counsel for the de facto

complainant, the persons in whose favour the cheques were

issued had already filed complaints before the police for

investigating the above matter, and registration of those crimes is

on the anvil. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for

the de facto complainant submitted that the matter would

require effective investigation by questioning the petitioner in

custody, who misappropriated a huge amount to unearth the
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

11

2025:KER:54898

seriousness of the allegation, and therefore, anticipatory bail

could not be granted.

7. The learned counsel for the additional 3rd and 4th

respondents also shared the argument of the additional 2nd

respondent and submitted that overall scrutiny of the

prosecution materials would make the allegations against the

petitioner warranting investigation. The learned counsel given

much emphasis to Annexure – A11 letter, admittedly sent by the

petitioner to the Chief Minister of Kerala where she admitted

that she had done some illegal activities as directed by the

Administrative Committee and the President. She was ready to

face consequences for the same. According to the learned
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

12

2025:KER:54898

counsel for the additional respondents 3 and 4, they lost Rs.60

lakh in this matter. Thus, it is pointed out that the role of the

petitioner regarding the allegation is an admitted fact, rather than

mere allegations, and in such a case, without having the custodial

interrogation, release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail would

impede the investigation. Therefore, he zealously opposed grant

of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

8. Addressing the arguments advanced by the additional

2nd, 3rd, and 4th respondents, the learned Public Prosecutor

conceded their grievance and strongly opposed grant of

anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The learned Public

Prosecutor produced a report of the Inspector of Police, Kollam
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

13

2025:KER:54898

West Police Station, and submitted that apart from this crime,

another crime (Crime No. 1176/2025) was also registered against

the petitioner as on 10.07.2025. That apart, twenty complaints

with similar allegations were already filed before the police

station, necessitating registration of crimes in this regard. Since

the allegations are serious, granting anticipatory bail to the

petitioner without providing an opportunity to the prosecution

to effect custodial interrogation of the petitioner is fatal to the

investigation and successful prosecution.

9. On scrutiny of the prosecution allegations, along with

the records placed, the crux of the allegation is that the accused

herein, who has been working as the Secretary of Kollam
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

14

2025:KER:54898

Co-operative Building Society Q157, obtained unlawful

enrichment by obtaining deposits from third parties on the

premise of depositing the same in the Society by issuing forged

receipts and certificates and misappropriated the same by herself

and during investigation, as of now Rs.43,35,000/- was found to

be misappropriated by her. When the depositors demanded the

money, she had issued 12 cheques by forging the signature of the

President therein, who is the de facto complainant in this case

along with her signature, since the cheques of the Society would

be honoured only when signed by the President and Secretary. It

is relevant to note, as pointed out by the learned counsel for the

additional respondents 3 and 4, as per Annexure – A11 letter
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

15

2025:KER:54898

dated 03.07.2025 forwarded by the accused to the Chief

Minister, she partially admitted the financial crisis and liability of

the Society on account of failure to return the deposits by

admitting her role in the illegalities with the President. In the

report of the Investigating Officer, it is stated that now

investigation for the offences punishable under Sections 406,

409, 420, 465, 468, and 471 of the IPC as well as Section 13(1)

r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act

has been going on and it was requested by the Inspector of Police

to the VACB to take over investigation in view of incorporation

of the PC Act offences. In the report, it is pointed out that the

case is under preliminary stage of investigation. Hence, custodial
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

16

2025:KER:54898

interrogation of the petitioner is absolutely necessary to ascertain

the truth of the allegation in depth involving a huge sum, and in

such a case, grant of anticipatory bail would impede the

investigation and would lead to the possibility of the petitioner

influencing the witnesses by threat and coercion.

10. It is discernible from the prosecution records that one

Abhijith deposited Rs.25 lakh to the Society with an undertaking

to deposit a total sum of Rs.50 lakh on assurance to provide him

an employment therein. But he has filed a criminal case on

dishonour of cheque for Rs.25 lakh issued by the Society in part

payment of the amount at his instance. This is evident from
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

17

2025:KER:54898

Annexure – A11 letter given by Abijith to the President of the

Society.

11. It is interesting to note that in this matter, the

allegation against the petitioner is very serious and the same is to

the effect that she misappropriated Rs.43,35,000/-. In such a

case, as pointed out by the Investigating Officer and as submitted

by the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the

additional respondent Nos.2, 3, and 4, a thorough investigation

by effectively questioning the petitioner in custody is absolutely

necessary to investigate as the amount misappropriated and

where the same is now. In such a case involving

misappropriation of a huge sum, grant of anticipatory bail to the
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

18

2025:KER:54898

petitioner would be fatal to the investigation and the interest of

the victims who lost the amount, so also the same would impede

successful prosecution.

12. Even though, it is pointed out by the learned counsel

for the petitioner that the petitioner has some health issues,

referring to Annexures — A9 and A10, it appears that the same

was issued on 07.05.2025 when she applied for leave from

08.05.2015 suggesting that she has some issues with disc and she

would require three months leave. As per Annexure A10 dated

10.11.2022 (three years before), some mild diffuse disc bulge was

the impression as per MRI examination. In fact, these are not

reasons to see any serious ailment to the petitioner since she
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

19

2025:KER:54898

worked as the Society after 10.11.2022 till 07.05.2022 with the

same discomfort. Thus bail plea on the said ground also would

not yield.

In the result, this petition is dismissed with direction to the

petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer forthwith,

and on failure to do so, the Investigating Officer is free to arrest

the petitioner as per law.

          ​      ​   ​    ​      ​        ​   ​   ​   Sd/-

                                              A.​BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE
   RMV​
 BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

                                  20


                                                       2025:KER:54898

                 APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 8273/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1            A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO 1085 /2025
                       OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE
Annexure A2            A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 29/10/2023
                       FROM ABHIJIT T.S.
Annexure A3            A TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE DATED
                       06/09/2024 BY ADVOCATE MR. SOORANAD . C
                       .JAYAKUMAR
Annexure A4            A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 03/05/2025

TO THE HONOURABLE MINISTER FOR COOPERATION
Annexure A5 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 03/05/2025
TO THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
Annexure A6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 05-05-25 BY
PETITIONER TO THE PRESIDENT KOLLAM
CO-OPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY
Annexure A7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11-09-2024 IN
W.P.(C) NO 11038/23 AND CONNECTED CASES
Annexure A8 TRUE COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE AND
MEMORANDUM OF AUDIT IN THE YEAR 2023-2024
DATED 30/12/2024
Annexure A9 TREATMENT CERTIFICATE DATED 07/05/2025 FROM
ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEON DR. SUBASH B.
Annexure A10 TRUE COPY OF THE MRL SCAN REPORT DATED
10/11/2022
Annexure A11 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 03/07/2025
BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA
Annexure A12 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 03/07/2025
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CHIEF POLICE OFFICER
Annexure A13 SCREENSHOTS OF THE MESSAGE UPDATES REGARDING
THE PETITION
RESPONDENT ANNEXURES

Annexure R2(a) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
08.06.2025 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT BEFORE THE
SHO, KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION ALONG WITH
BAIL APPL. NO. 8273 OF 2025

21

2025:KER:54898

RECEIPT NO.15995003-2025-5-00739 EVEN DATED
Annexure R2(b) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
27.06.2025 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT BEFORE THE
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOLLAM CITY ALONG
WITH RECORDS AND POSTAL RECEIPT EVEN DATED
Annexure R2(c) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
07.07.2025 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT BEFORE THE
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOLLAM CITY ALONG
POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 08.07.2025
PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A14 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT AND AVAILABLE PAGES OF
THE MINUTES BOOKS OF THE SOCIETY FROM
12-09-2016
Annexure A15 TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE WHATSAPP
MESSAGES BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND DE-FACTO
COMPLAINANT
RESPONDENT ANNEXURES

Annexure R4(a) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
12.06.2025 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT BEFORE THE
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOLLAM CITY ALONG
WITH RECORDS

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here