Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Mahesh Khatri @ Bholi vs State Nct Of Delhi on 24 July, 2025
Author: Surya Kant
Bench: Surya Kant
1
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.2 SECTION II-D
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).1422/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-11-2024
in BA No.4110/2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi]
MAHESH KHATRI @ BHOLI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent(s)
FOR ADMISSION
IA No. 25948/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
Date : 24-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Adv.
Ms. Joshini Tuli, Adv.
Mr. Joginder Tuli, Adv.
Mrs. Gargi Khanna, AOR
Mr. Lalit Khanna, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. S. D. Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv.
Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv.
Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Sunanda Shukla, Adv.
Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking
enlargement on bail in FIR No. 96/2021, registered at P.S. Narela
under Sections 307, 386, 506 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 25 and
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
SATISH KUMAR YADAV
27 of the Arms Act.
Date: 2025.07.28
17:08:15 IST
Reason:
2. The petitioner was branded as a hardened criminal as
there were 55 criminal cases registered against him, mostly
involving heinous crimes. He was also convicted in two such cases.
2
It is in this backdrop that we declined him bail vide the order
dated 03.02.2025. At the same time, having regard to the right to
speedy trial, flowing from Article 21 of the Constitution, we
directed the prosecution to show cause as to why a mechanism for
speedy trial be not in place. It is in furtherance of the orders
passed by this Court from time to time that an Additional Affidavit
has been filed by the DCP, Outer North District, Delhi, inter alia,
pointing out that a total of 288 cases are pending trial in NCT of
Delhi, out of which charges have been framed in only 108 cases. In
180 cases, the charges are yet to be framed. It is further
explained that only 25% of the cases have reached the stage of
commencement of prosecution evidence. It is candidly acknowledged
that there is a gap of three to four years between the framing of
charges and commencement of the prosecution evidence.
3. The affidavit highlights that due to multiplicity of
offences, jurisdictions, and legal classifications, different
criminal cases involving members of the same gang are being tried
before different courts, including regular Sessions Courts, Special
NDPS Courts, and Special MCOCA Courts. One of the factors
prolonging the trials, as mentioned in the affidavit, is that the
designated courts handle other routine matters such as IPC/BNS
offences, EOW matters, ED cases etc. and, thus, these courts are
burdened with multiple sensitive matters. A pointed reference has
been made to the provisions of the new Criminal Procedure Law to
underscore the importance of speedy trial.
4. The affidavit further seeks a direction from this Court
for the establishment of Dedicated Court Complexes within the jail
premises to conduct the trial of criminal gang-related cases and to
issue directions for :
(a) Speedy trial and conviction of the UTP gang
members and kingpins.
(b) Fewer opportunities or grounds for seeking bail
on the ground of delays in trial proceedings.
(c) Better control over safety and security
measures at dedicated court premises, enabling better safety
3for witnesses as well as accused persons.
(d) Expeditious cognizance in chargesheets filed by
police against gang members etc.
(e) Reducing the opportunities for the generation
of reels and other social media content glamourizing the
criminals’ lives, which are observed when gang-related
criminals are transported from jails to court complexes at
various locations.
5. We have heard learned Additional Solicitor General of
India with reference to the above-mentioned affidavit.
6. While there can be no doubt that the establishment of
dedicated courts for speedy trial of hardened criminals or
professional gangsters so that the courts are not confronted with a
situation to release them on bail; enhanced control over safety and
security including of the witnesses; expeditious cognizance of a
matter where the chargesheet has been filed, and reduction in
generation of social media contents are some of the effective steps
which are a need of hour. However, a holistic view is required to
be taken by all the stakeholders, especially the Union of India,
the Government of NCT of Delhi, and the High Court of Delhi (with
reference to the cases pending in the NCT of Delhi). While the
High Court would never object to providing speedy trial by
establishing dedicated courts for this purpose, this can only
happen provided that the Union of India and the Government of NCT
of Delhi resolve to establish Fast Track Courts for trial of these
cases. For this, additional posts of Judicial Officers in the
Superior Judicial Services will have to be created; alternatively,
a separate ad hoc cadre for such courts may have to be evolved. The
infrastructural facilities, secretarial assistance, and other
requisite staff that may be required for the Presiding Officer of
the Court must also be provided.
7. It goes without saying that, keeping in view the pendency
of 288 trials against gangsters etc., there will have to be an
appropriate strength of courts to ensure that these cases can be
4
equitably distributed and then trials can be taken on a day-to-day
basis. If such a decision is taken by the appropriate authorities,
it seems to us that all the pending trials can be brought to an end
for which some more directions like compulsory appearance of the
defence counsel, dispensation of adjournments, and a time-line for
the purpose of completion of investigation, filing of chargesheet,
framing of charges, proper use of IPC Rules etc. will also be
issued at an appropriate stage.
8. For the purpose of effectivity of this order, let notice
be issued to the Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of
Home Affairs, returnable on 12.09.2025.
9. On our asking, Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional
Solicitor General, accepts notice on behalf of the Union of India.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR