Ms.Tejaswini Vishwanath vs The Union Of India on 25 July, 2025

0
43

Telangana High Court

Ms.Tejaswini Vishwanath vs The Union Of India on 25 July, 2025

    * THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR

                + WRIT PETITION No.35635 of 2024

% Dated 25-07-2025
Between:

# Ms. Tejaswini Vishwanath
                                                           ... Petitioner

                                 and

$ The Union of India,
  Ministry of External Affairs,
  South Block Cabinet, Secretariat, Raisina Hill,
  New Delhi - 110011 and others.
                                                      .... Respondents



! Counsel for the Petitioner           :       Mr. J.Suresh Rao

^ Counsel for the respondents          :       Mr. A. Kranthi Kumar Reddy

< GIST                                 :       ---

>HEAD NOTE                                 :    ---

? Cases referred:                  :
                                                                     NVSK, J
                                    2                       W.P. No.35635 of 2024




     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR

                        W.P. No.35635 of 2024

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.2, Regional

Passport Officer, in refusing to process the Passport Application

No.HY1066442243124 dated 10.04.2024 under Service Type Fresh

and Type of Application Normal for Tejaswini Vishwanath, who is a

minor petitioner represented by her biological father Sri Shailender

Vishwanath, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Facts in brief as stated in the present writ petition are as under:

3. The father of the minor petitioner married one Vanapally

Varalaxmi on 27.03.2008 and out of their wedlock they were blessed

with a baby girl, who is minor petitioner (hereinafter referred to as

‘the petitioner’), on 08.12.2009 and now she is studying X Class at

Olivemount Global School, Attapur, Hyderabad. Thereafter,

the mother of the petitioner deserted petitioner’s father company on

12.12.2012 while he was working in USA and at that time the

petitioner was three years old. At present, the father of the petitioner

is a permanent citizen of USA.

4. The father of the petitioner filed a petition in O.P. No.290 of

2023 under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against

his wife seeking dissolution of marriage solemnized on 27.03.2008

and also filed a petition in O.P. No.287 of 2023 under Section 7, 10
NVSK, J
3 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

and 25 of Guardian and Wards Act seeking permanent custody of his

daughter (petitioner) that were allowed vide orders dated 27.02.2024.

The petitioner is interested in pursuing Pilot course and after

completion of her graduation would like to join her father at USA.

Hence, applied for the Passport on 10.04.2024 vide Application

No.HY1066442243124. The respondent No.2 has refused to issue the

Passport stating the reason that “In cases where one parent renounced

the Indian Citizenship and the other parent is still an Indian citizen, the

citizenship of the minor shall be of that person who has legal custody of

that minor child and the eligibility of an Indian Passport will be

determined on the basis of his/her citizenship.” Challenging the same,

petitioner filed the present writ petition.

5. On behalf of the respondent No.2, Regional Passport Officer,

while denying the writ averments, had filed counter affidavit, inter alia,

stating that the father of the petitioner has applied for Passport of his

minor daughter on 10.04.2024 vide Application

No.HY1066442243124 under fresh category and subsequently

received an adverse Police verification report on 18.04.2024 with the

remarks stating that “the Applicant not residing in the given address

hence not recommended”. Thereafter, respondent No.2 issued an

objection letter dated 19.04.2024 requesting the father of the minor

petitioner to furnish clarification/explanation within 30 days.

However, no response was received. The father of the petitioner,

at the time of submitting fresh passport application on 10.04.2024,
NVSK, J
4 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

declared that earlier he had submitted an application for Passport in

the year 2022 vide File No.HY1064493135722 and the same could not

be processed due to lack of documents and requested to close the file.

6. From the fresh passport application dated 10.04.2024, it is

informed that the father of the petitioner has acquired the citizenship

of USA after renunciation of Indian Citizenship. As per the guidelines

mentioned in Para No.3.2(ii) under Chapter 9 of the Passport Manual-

2020 that “In cases where one parent renounced the Indian Citizenship

and the other parent is still an Indian Citizen, the citizenship of the

minor shall be of that person who has legal custody of that minor child

and the eligibility of an Indian Passport will be determined on the basis

of his/her citizenship”. In accordance with the clarification issued by

the Ministry of External Affairs vide Office Memorandum

No.VI.401/1/1/1/2018 dated 31.07.2024 at Paragraph 4, it is stated

that “when one parent renounces the Indian Citizenship U/s 8 of

Citizenship Act and other parent continues to hold Indian Citizenship

and the parents either get divorced and the custody of the child is given

to one of the parents or without divorce the court has given legal

custody of the child of one of the parents in such case

(if only one parent has renounced Indian citizenship and other parent is

still an Indian Citizen), the citizenship of minor shall be of that parent

who has the legal custody of that minor child.” Further, a reference

was made to Ministry of Home Affairs, letter No.26030/24/2012-IC-I

(Vol.III) dated 08.03.2018 wherein it is stated that “If only one parent
NVSK, J
5 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

has renounced Indian Citizenship and the other parent is still an Indian

citizen, the citizenship of the minor shall be of that person who has legal

custody of that minor child”.

7. In the present case, admittedly the father of the petitioner has

acquired foreign citizenship after renunciation of Indian citizenship

and the Family Court vide its order dated 06.05.2024 in O.P. No.287

of 2023 has granted permanent custody of the child to the father of

the child (petitioner). In view of the above and considering the

regulations, the minor petitioner is not entitled for issuance of

Passport. Hence, the respondent No.2 has issued a letter dated

06.05.2024 to the father of the minor petitioner refusing the passport

services to his minor daughter as per the applicable rules/guidelines

and eventually prayed to dismiss the writ petition.

Submissions:

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner was born in India and her parents were citizens of India at

the time of minor petitioner’s birth. Subsequently, her parents have

got separated and the permanent custody of the minor petitioner is

given to her father. The father of the petitioner possesses OCI Card

(Overseas Citizen of India Card) and the petitioner does not possess

travel document of any country and Non-issuance of a travel

document or passport to the petitioner would render her stateless and

that there is no cogent reason to deny issuance of Passport to the

petitioner.

NVSK, J
6 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

9. A Memo has been filed to the effect that the father of the minor

petitioner has obtained the OCI – Overseas Citizen of India Card.

Presently, the petitioner is staying along with her grand parents and

pursuing her school education and that petitioner has not renounced

her Indian Citizenship on her own at any point of time and the

petitioner being a minor child, the permanent custody is with her

father. It is further submitted that the petitioner was born on

08.12.2009 and both the parents of the petitioner were Indian Citizens

at the time of the birth of the petitioner. The marriage of the parents

of the minor petitioner was dissolved under Section 13(1)(ib) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by order dated 27.02.2024 in O.P. No.290

of 2023 and the permanent custody of the minor petitioner was

granted to the father of the minor petitioner on 27.02.2024 in

O.P. No.289 of 2023.

10. The learned counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to the

Section 3 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 as per which, a person born in

India between January 26, 1950, and July 1, 1987, is an Indian citizen

by birth, regardless of the nationality of their parents. For those born

after July 1, 1987, at least one parent must be an Indian citizen at the

time of birth. Further, as per Section 8(2) of the Citizenship Act, when

a parent renounces Indian citizenship, their minor child also ceases to

be an Indian citizen. However, Courts have interpreted this provision

in the light of the child’s best interests, especially when the child has

not acquired any other nationality, to prevent statelessness.

NVSK, J
7 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

In the present case, the minor petitioner born in India to Indian

parents and the father of the minor petitioner, who has legal custody,

has obtained U.S. citizenship. The key considerations are that

whether the minor has acquired any foreign citizenship; in this regard,

the learned counsel has placed reliance in the case of Chrisella

Valanka Kushi Raj Naidu Vs. The Ministry of External Afftars

(High Court of Bombay at Goa in W.P. No.135 of 2024 dated

28.08.2024) and submitted that the acquisition of foreign citizenship

by parents does not affect Indian citizenship of minor child.

For further consideration of the point that whether the minor’s Indian

citizenship has been formally renounced; in this regard, the learned

counsel has placed reliance in the case of Master Arya Selvakumar

Priya Vs. Joint Secretary (Psp) (High Court of Karnataka at

Bengaluru in W.P. No.21642 of 2022, dated 21.03.2023) and would

submit that if the minor has not acquired any other nationality and

has not renounced the Indian citizenship, Courts have upheld the

child’s status as an Indian citizen and directed for issuance of a

passport to prevent statelessness. Under these peculiar facts and

circumstances, prayed this Court to consider the case of the minor

petitioner and direct the respondents to process the application of the

petitioner for issuance of passport.

NVSK, J
8 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

11. The learned counsel representing the respondents has reiterated

the counter averments and sought to dismiss the writ petition.

ANALYSIS:

12. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material made available on the record.

13. A bare perusal of the impugned refusal order dated 06.05.2024

issued by the respondent No.2, Regional Passport Officer, Hyderabad,

a reference to Passport Manual – 2020, Chapter 9, Para No.3.2 has

been taken wherein it is stated that “In cases where one parent has

renounced the Indian Citizenship and the other parent is still an Indian

Citizen, the citizenship of the minor shall be of that person who has

legal custody of that minor child and the eligibility of an Indian Passport

will be determined on the basis of his/her Citizenship.” It is an

admitted fact that the parents of the minor petitioner were got

separated vide order dated 27.02.2024 passed in O.P. No.290 of 2023

and the legal custody of the minor petitioner is given to her father.

14. At this stage, it is not out of place to refer an order dated

16.12.2024 passed in W.P. No.25962 of 2024 by this Court wherein,

challenge was made against the action of the Passport authority in not

considering the application given for issuance of the Passport to the

minor petitioner therein on the ground that consent of the other

parent or a Court order for the same is required and issued a letter

No.OBJ/ 319450755/2024 dated 10.09.2024. This Court has
NVSK, J
9 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

considered the submissions made by the learned Deputy Solicitor

General of India, appearing for the Union of India and passport

authorities, relied on an Office Memorandum issued by the Ministry of

External Affairs dated 31.07.2024 as well as a clarification dated

08.03.2018 to urge that passports to minor children whose parents

have obtained foreign citizenship or have renounced their Indian

citizenship must abide by the clauses in the Office Memorandum.

After considering the aforesaid objections of Office Memorandum

issued by the Ministry of External Affairs dated 31.07.2024 as well as

a clarification dated 08.03.2018, this Court allowed the writ petition

directing the Passport authority to consider the application made for

issuing passport to the minor child. Relevant paras No.18, 19 and 20

of the said order are extracted for reference.

“18. The Office Memorandum (OM) dated
30.07.2024 which the learned Deputy Solicitor
General of India relies on does not assist the case
of the respondents and cannot be an impediment
for granting relief to the petitioner. First, the OM
relates to “reissue” of passports to minor children.
Second, Clause 3(c)(iii) of the OM deals with the
effect of the parent of the minor child having
acquired citizenship of another country and the
consequent effect of such on a child. Third, Clause
4 also deals with the citizenship of the minor
where one of the parent renounces citizenship and
the other parent continues to hold Indian
citizenship and the custody of the child is given to
one of the parents with or without divorce. None
of these clauses apply to the issue at hand,
NVSK, J
10 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

namely, whether a single parent can apply for
passport of a minor child.

19. Most importantly, the OM, even if applicable
cannot replace The Passports Act, 1967 and the
198O Rules framed thereunder which specifically
takes those cases into account where a single
parent is entitled to apply for a passport for his/
her minor child without the consent or signature
of the other parent, subject to furnishing of the
prescribed Annexure.

20. Column 16, as stated above, highlights that if
a single parent/applicant is not in a position to
obtain the consent of the other parent
‘for whatever reason” the applicant-parent may
complete the necessary formalities in aid of the
application. The fact that the respondent No.3 has
acquired American citizenship does not make the
case different from the one provided in Column 16
or a departure thereunder. “For whatever reason’
attracts every conceivable situation and the
respondent No.3 becoming an American citizen
cannot and does not render Column 16
inapplicable to the facts of the present case.”

15. In the instant case, counter filed on behalf of the respondents

has referred the very same Office Memorandum issued by the Ministry

of External Affairs dated 31.07.2024 as well as a clarification dated

08.03.2018 for not processing the Passport application of the minor

petitioner herein. Hence, the same cannot be an impediment for

granting relief to the minor petitioner herein.

NVSK, J
11 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

16. Apart from the above, father of the minor petitioner has

renounced his Indian Citizenship and obtained the Citizenship of USA

and also obtained the OCI – Overseas Citizen of Indian Card. Mother

of the minor petitioner deserted her husband and her whereabouts are

not known and her status of citizenship is also not known. In view of

the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the minor petitioner

cannot be rendered statelessness.

17. Relevant to the context of the present case is Section 3 of the

Citizenship Act, which provides for acquisition of citizenship by birth.

Section 3 reads thus:-

“3. Citizenship by birth.- (1) Except as
provided in sub-section (2), every person born
in India,-

(a) on or after the 26th day of January, 1950, but
before the 1st day of July, 1987;

(b) on or after the 1st day of July, 1987, but before
the commencement of the Citizenship
(Amendment) Act, 2003
and either of whose
parents is a citizen of India at the time of his
birth;

(c) on or after the commencement of the
Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003, where-

(i) both of his parents are citizens of India; or
NVSK, J
12 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

(ii) one of whose parents is a citizen of India
and the other is not an illegal migrant at the
time of his birth, shall be a citizen of India
by birth.

(2) A person shall not be a citizen of India by virtue
of this section if at the time of his birth-

(a) either his father or mother possesses such
immunity from suits and legal process as is
accorded to an envoy of a foreign sovereign
power accredited to the President of India and
he or she, as the case may be, is not a citizen
of India; or

(b) his father or mother is an enemy alien and
the birth occurs in a place then under
occupation by the enemy.”

18. It is thus seen that Section 3 (1) (c) (i) stipulates that except as

provided in sub-section (2), every person born in India on or after the

commencement of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003, where (i)

both of his parents are citizens of India; or (ii) one of whose parents is

a citizen of India and the other is not an illegal migrant at the time of

his birth, shall be a citizen of India by birth.

19. On a careful perusal of the refusal order, the petitioner, as on

today, has not taken citizenship of any other country and strictly

applying the provisions of Section 3 (1) (c) (i) of the Indian Citizenship

Act, the petitioner is a citizen of India by birth as such,

the respondent authority cannot deny the passport service to her.

NVSK, J
13 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

Further, merely the father of the petitioner, who has the legal custody

of the petitioner and had renounced his Indian Citizenship and

acquired the foreign citizenship, cannot disentitle the petitioner for

granting of Indian Passport. Article 21 includes the right to identity,

nationality and dignity and denying a child citizenship or rendering

them Stateless would be unconstitutional. The Hon’ble Supreme

Court in the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (1978 AIR

597) held that the right to travel abroad and obtain a Passport is part

of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

20. In view of the statutory provisions under Section 3 of the

Citizenship Act, 1955 read with Constitutional guarantees enshrined

in Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is

a minor, cannot be rendered Stateless.

21. In view of the above, having regard to the peculiar facts and

circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned

counsel on either side, the impugned order dated 06.05.2024 is set

aside and this writ petition is allowed. The respondents No.1 and 2

are directed to process the Passport application of the minor petitioner

and complete the process of issuing the Passport within a period of

three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There

shall be no order as to costs.

NVSK, J
14 W.P. No.35635 of 2024

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending,

shall stand closed.

________________________________
JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
Date: 25.07.2025

Note: L.R. copy to be marked.

B/o.

LSK

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here