[ad_1]
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Sabu Devi vs Nagaur Zilla Khadi Gramodyog Sangh … on 29 July, 2025
Author: Yogendra Kumar Purohit
Bench: Yogendra Kumar Purohit
[2025:RJ-JD:33251]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 192/2025
1. Sabu Devi W/o Binjaram Meghwal, Aged About 63 Years,
Resident Near Locust Protection Department, Basni Road,
District Nagaur.
2. Kailash S/o Binjaram Meghwal, Aged About 34 Years,
Resident Of Near Locust Protection Department, Basni
Road, District Nagaur.
----Appellants
Versus
Nagaur Zilla Khadi Gramodyog Sangh, Basni Road, Nagaur
Through Secretary, Tilokram S/o Kojaram
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 187/2025
1. Pratapram S/o Sh. Savataram, Aged About 71 Years, R/o
Near Locust Protection Department, Basni Road, Dist.
Nagaur,raj.
2. Likhmaram S/o Pratapram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o
Near Locust Protection Department, Basni Road, Dist.
Nagaur,raj.
----Appellants
Versus
Nagaur Zilla Khadi Gramodyog Sangh, Basni Road, Nagaur,
Through Secretary, Tilokram Son Of Kojaram
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 190/2025
1. Prabhuram S/o Sanwalram, Aged About 71 Years,
Resident Of Near Locust Protection Department, Basni
Road, District Nagaur.
2. Megharam S/o Prabhuram, Aged About 43 Years,
Resident Of Near Locust Protection Department, Basni
Road, District Nagaur.
----Appellants
Versus
Nagaur Zilla Khadi Gramodyog Sangh, Basni Road, District
Nagaur, Through Secretary, Tilokram S/o Kojaram
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Falgun Buch
Mr. Vasudev Gaur
Mr. Gopal Krishna Chhangani
Ms. Simran Mehta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinay Jain
Mr. Devendra Prajapat
Mr. Mudit Balia
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (2 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
Reserved on 11/07/2025
Pronounced on 29/07/2025
01- vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ;g rhuksa f}rh; vihys fo}ku fopkj.k
U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh’k] ukxkSj ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 14-12-2023 o bl
fu.kZ; dh iqf”V djrs gq, ikfjr izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ftyk U;k;k/kh’k la[;k
01] ukxkSj ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 24-02-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
02- la{ksi esa ekeys ds rF; izdkj ls gSa fd izR;FkhZ&oknh ukxkSj ftyk [kknh
xzkeks|ksx la?k dh vksj ls izfroknhx.k ds fo#) okni= izLrqr dj ;g fuosnu fd;k
fd oknhx.k la?k dk eq[; mn~ns’; ukxkSj ftys esa csjkstxkjh nwj djus ds fy, lqnwj
xzkeh.k {ks= esa drkbZ cqukbZ dj jkstxkj iznku djuk gSA bl laLFkk dks jkT; ljdkj
us [kljk uacj 269@707] 1964 esa 99 o”kZ ds yht ij 4 ch?kk 10 fcLok vkoafVr dh
xbZ FkhA o”kZ 2004 esa bl yht dks c<+kdj 5 ch?kk dj fn;k x;k] mlesa fu/kkZfjr
yht jsaV 5 ch?kk dk oknh }kjk vnk fd;k tkrk jgk gSA
03- izR;FkhZ&oknh dh vksj ls ;g fuosnu fd;k fd o”kZ 1967 esa bl laLFkk
us laiw.kZ tehu ij djhc 5&6 QqV dh pkjnhokjh [kM+h dj nh o iwohZ vk/ks Hkkx ij
laLFkk ds vkWfQl] nqdkus] fiatkbZ e’khusa o dk;ZdrkZvksa ds fuokl ds DokVj cus gq,
gSaA mRrjh&if’peh Hkkx esa vkM+ ds lgkjs&lgkjs 29 DokVj o vkxs ysVªhau ckFk:e
cus gq, Fks] tks fVM~Mh foHkkx rd gSa] muesa ls 2 DokVj fiatkbZ foHkkx esa feyk fn;s
o ‘ks”k 27 DokVj cps gaS] ftuesa xzkeh.k {ks=ksa ls cqudj vkrs gSa vkSj laLFkk }kjk iznRr
/kkxs ls cqukbZ djds laLFkk dks nsrs gSaA if’pe esa tks 27 DokVj cus gq, gSa] muds
vkxs fVu’ksM dk cjkenk gS vkSj nf{k.k dh rjQ [kqyrk yksgs dk QkVd yxk gqvk
gSA laLFkk dk ikuh dusD’ku Hkh cqudjksa ds fy, fy;k gqvk gS vkSj laLFkk }kjk
fctyh budks ehVj yxkdj miyC/k djokbZ tk jgh gSA bu DokVjksa esa lkcwnsoh dh
vihy ds ekeys esa DokVj uacj 11] 12 ds laca/k esa izfroknhx.k dks fn;s x;s mldh
v.MjVsfdax nh gqbZ gksuk vkSj DokVj uacj 13] 14 ij Hkh dCtk djds mi;ksx esa
fy;k tkuk crk;k x;k gSA vihy izrkijke okys ekeys esa DokVj uacj 7 ls 10
izfroknhx.k dks fn;s x;s] mldh v.MjVsfdax nh gqbZ gS] tks fcuk fdjk;s fn;s mi;ksx
esa ysuk ‘kq: dj fn;kA bl izdkj izHkqjke okys ekeys esa DokVj la[;k 15 ls 22 ds
laca/k esa v.MjVsfdax nh gqbZ gksuk crk;k gSA
04- rhuksa gh izdj.kksa esa mDr ifjlj oknh laLFkk dh feyfd;r gksuk vkSj
mudh iwath ls fufeZr gksuk vkSj izfroknhx.k dks uksfVl nsdj funsZ’k nsus ds ckotwn
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (3 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
ifjlj dk dCtk [kkyh dj lqiwnZ ugha djus ls vfrØeh dh gSfl;r ls dkfct gksuk
crk;k gSA
05- vihykFkhZx.k&izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls rhuksa izdj.kksa esa vyx&vyx
tokcnkok izLrqr fd;k x;kA ;g fuosnu fd;k fd ifjlj izfroknhx.k ds LokfeRo
dk gS] dksbZ v.MjVsfdax izfroknhx.k }kjk ugha nh xbZ] oknh laLFkk dh feyfe;r dh
ugha gS vkSj fooknxzLr laifRr izfroknh ds ikl ykbZlsal ij ugha gSA bl vk/kkj ij
oknh dk okn [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
06- rhuksa izdj.kksa esa ;g tokcnsgh dh xbZ fd izfroknhx.k }kjk oknh laLFkk
ds i{k esa dksbZ fy[kki<+h ugha dhA izfroknhx.k rks oknh laLFkk ij fo’okl dj eky
cqukbZ gsrq fn;s tkus dh fy[kki<+h le>dj gh vius gLrk{kj fd, FksA Lora=]
lgefr o LosPNk ls fdlh izdkj dh v.MjVsfdax ugha nhA fooknxzLr ifjlj [kljk
uacj 259 xSj eqefdu vkcknh esa cus gksuk vkSj oknh laLFkk dh Hkwfe ls if’pe dh
rjQ 51 QhV dh Hkwfe NksM+dj iwohZ rjQ cus gksuk crk;k gSA
07- i{kdkjku ds vfHkopuksa ds vk/kkj ij izR;sd ekeys esa ikap&ikp
fook|d dk;e fd;s x;sA
08- i{kdkjku dh lk{; yh tkdj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; flfoy
U;k;k/kh’k] ukxkSj }kjk vius fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 14-12-2023 ds }kjk okn oknh
Lohdkj djrs gq, fMØh ikfjr dh xbZ vkSj izfroknhx.k dks ;g vknsf’kr fd;k x;k
fd fMØh dh fnukad ls rhu ekg ds Hkhrj oknh laLFkk ds ifjlj esa cus DokVj e;
cjkenk o [kqyh tehu dk dCtk oknh laLFkk dks lqiwnZ djsa vkSj okn ntZ djus dh
fnukad ls izfr DokVj ,d gtkj #i;s dh nj ls var%dkyhu ykHk izkIr djus ds
oknh laLFkk vf/kdkjh gksuk ?kksf”kr fd;k x;kA
09- vihykFkhZx.k }kjk izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds
fu.kZ; o fMØh fo#) vihy izLrqr dh xbZ] tks rhuksa ekeyksa esa izFke vihyh;
U;k;ky; vij ftyk U;k;k/kh’k la[;k 01] ukxkSj ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad
24-02-2025 ds }kjk vihy [kkfjt djrs gq, fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; o
fMØh dh iqf”V dh xbZA
10- vihykFkhZ }kjk bl U;k;ky; esa f}rh; vihy izLrqr dj ;g fuosnu
fd;k fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk egRoiw.kZ lk{; ij fopkj ugha fd;k x;k]
ftlds eqrkfcd oknh fooknxzLr laifRr dk ekfyd ugha gksuk Li”V gksrk gSA blds
laca/k esa izn’kZ 2 tekcanh] izn’kZ 10 ftyk dyDVj ukxkSj ls lrdZrk lfefr ds
QSlys dh izfr fnukad 19-07-2016] izn’kZ 13] izn’kZ 15,] izn’kZ 14 dh vksj /;ku
vkdf”kZr fd;k vkSj ;g Li”V fd;k fd bu nLrkostksa ds eqrkfcd oknh Lo;a vkoafVr
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (4 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
Hkwfe ls 1-5 ch?kk Hkwfe ij vfrØeh ds :i esa dkfct FkkA bl ekeys esa oknh dh vksj
ls ifjlj vihykFkhZx.k&izfroknhx.k dks ykbZlsal ij fn;k gksuk drbZ lkfcr ugha gS
vkSj bl ekeys esa dqy 5 Substantial Question of Law izLrkfor fd;s x;s gSaA
11- cgl ,Mfe’ku lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls
eq[; :i ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd bl ekeys esa fooknxzLr laifRr izR;FkhZ&oknh
ds feyfd;r dh laifRr ugha gS vkSj izR;FkhZ&oknh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ dks ykbZlsal
ij nh gksuk drbZ lkfcr ugha gSA vihykFkhZx.k&izfroknhx.k dk cjlksa ls fooknxzLr
laifRr ij dCtk gSA /kkjk 52 o /kkjk 53 Indian Easements Act, 1882 rFkk
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`”Vkar Baini Prasad (D) Thr. LRs. Vs.
Durga Devi, Manu/SC/0088/2023 dh vksj /;ku vkdf”kZr fd;kA bl vk/kkj ij
vihy ,MfeV fd;s tkus vkSj izLrkfor ikapksa Substantial Question of Law cuk,
tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
12- fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ us bldk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, ;g rdZ izLrqr
fd;k fd iwoZ esa izR;FkhZ&oknh ds uke ls 4 ch?kk 10 fcLok dk iV~Vk Fkk] tks ckn esa
c<+kdj dqy 5 ch?kk dk dj fn;k x;k vkSj oknhx.k ds 5 ch?kk Hkwfe esa gh izfroknh
dkfct gksuk crk;k vkSj izn’kZ 10 fnukad 19-07-2016 ds vk/kkj ij Li”V fd;k fd
oknh la?k ds dCts’kqnk ifjlj esa cqudjksa ds fy, ‘ksM cus gq, gksuk vafdr gS vkSj
ckn esa uxjifj”kn ls iV~Vk izn’kZ 15&, Hkh oknh la?k dks ns fn;k x;kA
13- Lohd`r :i ls oknh la?k esa izfroknhx.k o mlds ifjokj ds
lnL;ksa }kjk oknh la?k }kjk iznRr /kkxs ls cqukbZ dh tkrh FkhA orZeku esa
vihykFkhZx.k }kjk dksbZ dk;Z ugha fd;k tk jgk gSA izdj.k lkcwnsoh okys ekeys esa
v.MjVsfdax is’k ugha djuk ijarq vU; nks izdj.kksa izrkijke o izHkwjke okys ekeys esa
v.MjVsfdax izfroknhx.k }kjk gLrk{kfjr is’k dh tkuk crk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj
orZeku esa uksfVl ds ckotwn ifjlj [kkyh ugha djus ls tks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk
fMØh nh xbZ og fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa }kjk lk{; ij iw.kZ :i
ls fopkj dj ikfjr fu.kZ; ds laca/k esa dksbZ lkjoku fof/kd iz’u mRiu ugha gksrk gSA
bl vk/kkj ij vihy ,Mfe’ku dh LVst ij [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
14- eSaus mijksDr rdksZa ij euu fd;k o i=koyh dk lko/kkuhiwoZd
voyksdu fd;kA
15- f}rh; vihy dks fopkjkFkZ xzg.k djus ls iwoZ bl iz’u ij fopkj djuk
vko’;d gS fd bl ekeys esa dksbZ lkjHkwr fof/kd iz’u ¼ Substantial question of
law½ fo|eku gS vFkok ugha] tks /kkjk 100 lh-ih-lh- ds eqrkfcd 1976 esa gq, la’kks/ku
ds i’pkr gksuk vko’;d gSA
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (5 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
16- f}rh; vihy ds laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d
n`”Vkar Nazir Mohamed Vs. J. Kamala and Ors. [2020] 0 AIR(SC) 4321 ds
ekeys esa fofHkUu U;kf;d n`”Vkar ij fopkj djrs gq, iSjk la[;k 25] 26] 29 ls 37 esa
fuEukuqlkj fof/kd fLFkfr Li”V dh xbZ gS%&
“25. A second appeal, or for that matter, any appeal is
not a matter of right. The right of appeal is conferred
by statute. A second appeal only lies on a substantial
question of law. If statute confers a limited right of
appeal, the Court cannot expand the scope of the
appeal. It was not open to the Respondent-Plaintiff to
re-agitate facts or to call upon the High Court to
reanalyze or re-appreciate evidence in a Second
Appeal.
26. Section 100 of the CPC, as amended, restricts the
right of second appeal, to only those cases, where a
substantial question of law is involved. The existence of
a “substantial question of law” is the sine qua non for
the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 100 of the
CPC.
29. The principles for deciding when a question of law
becomes a substantial question of law, have been
enunciated by a Constitution Bench of this Court in Sir
Chunilal v. Mehta & Sons Ltd. v. Century Spg. & Mfg.
Co. Ltd., AIR 1962 SC 1314, where this Court held:
“The proper test for determining whether a question of
law raised in the case is substantial would, in our
opinion, be whether it is of general public importance or
whether it directly and substantially affects the rights of
the parties and if so whether it is either an open
question in the sense that it is not finally settled by this
Court or by the Privy Council or by the Federal Court or
is not free from difficulty or calls for discussion of
alternative views. If the question is settled by the
highest court or the general principles to be applied in
determining the question are well settled and there is a
mere question of applying those principles or that the
plea raised is palpably absurd the question would not
be a substantial question of law.”
30. In Hero Vinoth v. Seshammal, (2006) 5 SCC 545,
this Court referred to and relied upon Chunilal v. Mehta
and Sons (supra) and other judgments and summarised
the tests to find out whether a given set of questions of
law were mere questions of law or substantial questions
of law.
31. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment of this
Court in Hero Vinoth (supra) are set out hereinbelow:
“21. The phrase “substantial question of law”, as
occurring in the amended Section 100 CPC is not
defined in the Code. The word substantial, as
qualifying “question of law”, means of having
substance, essential, real, of sound worth,
important or considerable. It is to be understood
as something in contradistinction with-technical,
of no substance or consequence, or academic
merely. However, it is clear that the legislature(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (6 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]has chosen not to qualify the scope of
“substantial question of law” by suffixing the
words “of general importance” as has been done
in many other provisions such as Section 109 of
the Code or Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution.
The substantial question of law on which a
second appeal shall be heard need not
necessarily be a substantial question of law of
general importance. In Guran Ditta v. Ram Ditta
[(1927-28) 5I5 IA 235 : AIR 1928 PC 172] the
phrase substantial question of law as it was
employed in the last clause of the then existing
Section 100 CPC (since omitted by the
Amendment Act, 1973) came up for
consideration and their Lordships held that it did
not mean a substantial question of general
importance but a substantial question of law
which was involved in the case. In Sir Chunilal
case [1962 Supp (3) SCR 549 : AIR 1962 SC
1314] the Constitution Bench expressed
agreement with the following view taken by a
Full Bench of the Madras High Court in
Rimmalapudi Subba Rao v. Noony Veeraju [ AIR
1951 Mad 969 : (3) SCR 549 : (1951) 2 MLJ 222
(FB)] : (Sir Chunilal case [1962 Supp AIR 1962
SC 1314], SCR p. 557)
“When a question of law is fairly arguable, where
there is room for difference of opinion on it or
where the Court thought it necessary to deal
with that question at some length and discuss
alternative views, then the question would be a
substantial question of law. On the other hand if
the question was practically covered by the
decision of the highest court or if the general
principles to be applied in determining the
question are well settled and the only question
was of applying those principles to the particular
fact of the case it would not be a substantial
question of law.”
32. To be “substantial”, a question of law must be
debatable, not previously settled by the law of the land
or any binding precedent, and must have a material
bearing on the decision of the case and/or the rights of
the parties before it, if answered either way.
33. To be a question of law “involved in the case”, there
must be first, a foundation for it laid in the pleadings,
and the question should emerge from the sustainable
findings of fact, arrived at by Courts of facts, and it
must be necessary to decide that question of law for a
just and proper decision of the case.
34. Where no such question of law, nor even a mixed
question of law and fact was urged before the Trial
Court or the First Appellate Court, as in this case, a
second appeal cannot be entertained, as held by this
Court in Panchagopal Barua v. Vinesh Chandra
Goswami, AIR 1997 SC 1047.
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (7 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
35. Whether a question of law is a substantial one and
whether such question is involved in the case or not,
would depend on the facts and circumstances of each
case. The paramount overall consideration is the need
for striking a judicious balance between the
indispensable obligation to do justice at all stages and
the impelling necessity of avoiding prolongation in the
life of any lis. This proposition finds support from
Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari, (2001) 3 SCC
179.
36. In a Second Appeal, the jurisdiction of the High
Court being confined to substantial question of law, a
finding of fact is not open to challenge in second
appeal, even if the appreciation of evidence is palpably
erroneous and the finding of fact incorrect as held in
Ramchandra v. Ramalingam, AIR 1963 SC 302. An
entirely new point, raised for the first time, before the
High Court, is not a question involved in the case,
unless it goes to the root of the matter.
37. The principles relating to Section 100 CPC relevant
for this case may be summarised thus :
(i) An inference of fact from the recitals or
contents of a document is a question of fact, but
the legal effect of the terms of a document is a
question of law. Construction of a document,
involving the application of any principle of law,
is also a question of law. Therefore, when there
is misconstruction of a document or wrong
application of a principle of law in construing a
document, it gives rise to a question of law.
(ii) The High Court should be satisfied that the
case involves a substantial question of law, and
not a mere question of law. A question of law
having a material bearing on the decision of the
case (that is, a question, answer to which affects
the rights of parties to the suit) will be a
substantial question of law, if it is not covered by
any specific provisions of law or settled legal
principle emerging from binding precedents, and,
involves a debatable legal issue.
(iii) A substantial question of law will also arise in
a contrary situation, where the legal position is
clear, either on account of express provisions of
law or binding precedents, but the Court below
has decided the matter, either ignoring or acting
contrary to such legal principle. In the second
type of cases, the substantial question of law
arises not because the law is still debatable, but
because the decision rendered on a material
question, violates the settled position of law.
(iv) The general rule is, that High Court will not
interfere with the concurrent findings of the
Courts below. But it is not an absolute rule.
Some of the well-recognised exceptions are
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (8 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
where (i) the courts below have ignored material
evidence or acted on no evidence; (ii) the courts
have drawn wrong inferences from proved facts
by applying the law erroneously; or (iii)the
courts have wrongly cast the burden of proof. A
decision based on no evidence, does not refer
only to cases where there is a total dearth of
evidence, but also refers to case, where the
evidence, taken as a whole, is not reasonably
capable of supporting the finding.”
17- iwoZ esa of.kZr uthj eksgEen okys ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)karksa dks
en~nsutj j[krs gq, gLrxr ekeys ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
18- bl ekeys esa oknh fooknxzLr laifRr Lo;a dh feyfd;r edcwtk gksuk
crk jgk gS vkSj izfroknh Lo;a dh iqjkus dCts dh Hkwfe crk jgk gSA izfroknh }kjk
Lo;a dh feyfd;r gksuk ugha] cfYd Hkwfe uxjifj”kn dh gksuk crk;kA oknh laLFkk
dks izfroknh dks csn[ky djus dk vf/kdkj ugha gksuk crk;k x;k gSA bl ekeys
esa ;g Lohd`r fLFkfr gS fd [kljk uacj 269@707] 1964 esa 99 o”kZ dh yht ij 4
ch?kk 10 fcLok Hkwfe oknh dks vkoafVr Fkh] ftlds laca/k esa izn’kZ 2 tekcanh oknh ds
gd esa gksuk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy esa Hkh crk;k x;k gSA izn’kZ 2 dk
voyksdu fd;k x;k] ftlds eqrkfcd [kljk uacj 259@707] 4-10 ch?kk Hkwfe ukxkSj
xzkeks|ksx la?k dks o”kZ 1964 esa 99 o”kZ ds fy, jkT; ljdkj }kjk nh gqbZ gksuk Li”V
gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk viuh vihy esa izn’kZ 10 dks Hkh vk/kkfjr fd;k gSA izn’kZ 10 dk
voyksdu fd;kA dk;kZy; ftyk dysDVj] ukxkSj dh ^^cSBd dk;Zokgh fooj.k^^
fnukad 19-07-2016 dk gS] ftlesa ftyk lrZdrk lfefr] ukxkSj ds le{k vkuan ‘kekZ
ea=h ftyk [kknh xzkeks|ksx la?k] ukxkSj }kjk ukxkSj ftyk xzkeks|ksx la?k] ukxkSj laLFkk
dh Hkwfe ij iVokjh Jo.k yky iq= tksxkjke dk tcju dCtk gksuk crk;k x;k gS
vkSj vfrØe.k [kkyh djokus ds fy, fuosnu fd;k x;kA bl izdj.k ij ftyk
lrZdrk lfefr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA bl dk;Zokgh ls iwoZ mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ukxkSj
dks funsZ’k fn;k x;k Fkk fd fo’ks”kK vkj- vkbZ- o iVokjh dh ,d jktLo Vhe cuk
dj ukxkSj ftyk xzkeks|ksx la?k ukxkSj laLFkk dh Hkwfe dk lhekadu dj rjehe
djkosaA lhekadu djrs le; eqLrfdy ikWbZaV jsYos ykbu dh lhek dks ekuk tkosA
19- rglhynkj] ukxkSj }kjk fnukad 08-06-2016 }kjk voxr djk;k fd
[kljk uacj 259@707 jdck 4-10 ch?kk dk lhekKku djus ij ik;k fd mDr Hkwfe
[kknh xzkeks|ksx la?k ds ikl jsdMZ ls 1-05-12 ch?kk vf/kd Hkwfe ij dCtk gS] ftl ij
cSBd esa ;g funsZ’k fd;k x;k fd [kknh xzkeks|ksx la?k dh Hkwfe dh rjehe djokuk
lqfuf’pe djok;k tkos vkSj vxj vkoafVr Hkwfe ls vykok Hkwfe ikbZ tkrh gS rks mDr
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (9 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
Hkwfe vxj [kknh xzkeks|ksx vkoafVr djokuk pkgrk gS rks uxjifj”kn ds Lrj ij
dk;Zokgh djus esa l{ke gSA
20- ftl ij mi[k.M vf/kdkjh }kjk i= fnukad 13-07-2016 }kjk voxr
djk;k fd Hkwfe rjehe djokus ls v/;{k o lnL;ksa }kjk euk dj fn;k x;k vkSj
vf/kd Hkwfe dCts esa j[kuk pkgrs gaSA ^^xzkeks|ksx la?k ds ikl fjdkWMZ ij 1-05-12 ch?kk
vf/kd Hkwfe ij dkfct gS] ftlesa Hkwfe ds iwoZ fn’kk dh rjQ dk;kZy;] Hkou] nqdkusa
vkfn cus gq, gSa] if’pe fn’kk esa vf/kdka’k Hkwfe vkcknh [kkyh gS] mRrj fn’kk dh
rjQ nhokj ds lgkjs cqudjksa ds fy, ‘ksM cus gq, gSa] iwoZ fn’kk esa jsyos ykbu rd
[kkyh Hkwfe gS^^ ftl ij vkoaVu i=koyh esa feyku dj uD’kk esa rjehe lqfuf’pr
djus dk funsZ’k fn;k x;kA
21- izR;FkhZ&oknh dh vksj ls ihMCY;w 01 vtqZunkl }kjk vius l’kiFk
c;ku esa 4 ch?kk 10 fcLok tehu vkoafVr gqbZ gksuk crk;k x;k gSA mi[k.M
vf/kdkjh dh lrdZrk lfefr dks Hksth xbZ fjiksVZ o rglhynkj dh vksj ls lrdZrk
lfefr dks Hksth xbZ fjiksVZ dks Hkh iznf’kZr djok;k x;kA bl xokg us viuh ftjg
esa dgk fd oknh la?k ds 5 ch?kk 15 fcLok tehu ikbZ xbZ] ftl ij lrdZrk lfefr
us vf/k’ks”k tehu tks [kknh xzkeks|ksx la?k ds dCts esa gS] mldk fof/kor fu;eu
djokus ds fy, uxjifj”kn dks vkns’k fn;k Fkk] D;ksafd ml le; Hkwfe uxjikfydk
esa gLrkarfjr gks pqdh Fkh] blfy, mudks vf/kdkj Fkk] ftl ij xzkeks|ksx dh vksj
vkosnu dj fn;k x;k tks fopkjk/khu gSA ftjg esa ;g dgk fd izn’kZ 10 ds , ls ch
Hkkx esa vkoaVu@fu;eu@vfrØe.k ds laca/k esa fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dk fy[kk gS
vkSj ;g Li”V fd;k fd [kknh xzkeks|ksx dk dCtk laiw.kZ 5 ch?kk 15 fcLok Hkwfe ij
vkoaVu ds le; ls pyk vk jgk gSA
22- bl ekeys esa dk;kZy; ftyk dysDVj] ukxkSj ds vkns’k fnukad
23-10-2004 dks Hkh iznf’kZr djok;k gS] mlesa [kknh xzkeks|ksx la?k] ukxkSj ls 5 ch?kk
dh yht djokbZ] bl vkns’k esa of.kZr jkf’k olwyh ;ksX; gksuk djkj fn;k x;k gSA
23- izfroknh dh vksj ls ijhf{kr xokg dks uxjifj”kn }kjk tkjh iV~Vk
ftjg esa VsaMj fd;k x;k] tks bl ekeys esa iznf’kZr gqvk gS] tks iV~Vk dk;kZy;
uxjifj”kn] ukxkSj }kjk fnukad 18-02-2022 dks tkjh fd;k x;k gS] tks 1474-22
oxZxt dk gSA
24- nkSjkus cgl iV~Vk fof/klEer rjhds ls tkjh ugha gksus dh vkifRr dh]
ijarq ;g iV~Vk [kkfjt ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj okni= ds yafcr jgus ds nkSjku
uxjifj”kn }kjk tkjh fd;k x;k gSA
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (10 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
25- bl izdkj bl ekeys esa izn’kZ 10 ds voyksdu ls gh ;g Li”V gS fd
ftyk [kknh xzkeks|ksx la?k dh vksj ls viuh Hkwfe ij fd;s x;s dCts dks gVkus dh
dk;Zokgh gsrq vkosnu fd;k x;k Fkk] ftl ij oknh la?k dk dCtk 1-05-12 ch?kk Hkwfe
ij vf/kd ik;k x;k vkSj mudh Hkwfe ij nhokj ds lgkjs cqudjksa ds fy, ‘ksM cuk
gqvk gksuk ik;k x;k] ftlds laca/k esa okn ds yafcr jgrs uxjifj”kn ls iV~Vk tkjh
djok;k x;k gSA
26- Indian Easements Act, 1882 dh /kkjk 52 esa ykbZlsal dks ifjHkkf”kr
fd;k x;k gS vkSj /kkjk 53 esa dkSu ykbZlsal ns ldrk gS] mldk mYys[k fd;k x;k
gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls tks iwoZ esa of.kZr nqxkZnsoh okyk ekeyk
izLrqr fd;k x;k] og /kkjk 51 Vhih ,DV ls lacaf/kr gS] tks bl ekeys esa lqlaxr
ugha gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`”Vkar Chandavarkar Sita Ratna
Rao V/s Ashalata S. Guram (1986) O Supreme (S.C.) 349 iSjk la[;k 60 esa
‘Licence’ ds ckjs esa fuEukuqlkj Li”V fd;k x;k gS%&
“The Indian Easements Act, 1882 defines ‘Licence’.
Section 53 of the said Act stipulates that a licence
may be granted by any one in the circumstances
and to the extent to which he may transfer his
interests in the property ‘affected by the licence’.
Licence is a privilege to do something on the
premises which otherwise would be unlawful.
Licence is a personal privilege. See B.M. Lall v.
Dunlop Rubber & Co. Ltd. & Ors., [1968] 1 SCR 23.”
27- /kkjk 53 Indian Easements Act, 1882 ds vuqlkj ;g ugha ekuk tk
ldrk fd okni= izLrqr djus ds le; oknh la?k dk ekfydkuk gd fooknxzLr
laifRr ij ugha FkkA bl vk/kkj ij iwoZ esa Hkh oknh la?k izfroknhx.k dks ykbZlsal nsus
ds fy, l{ke u gks] ftl izdkj fdjk;k fu;a=.k vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj Hkw&Lokeh
fdjk;snkj ds laca/kksa ds fy, Hkw&Lokeh dk laifRr dk ekfyd gksuk vko’;d ugha gS]
mlh vuq:i ykbZlsalj dks ykbZlsalh ds fo#) izLrqr okn esa fooknxzLr laifRr ds
laca/k esa ekfydkuk gd lkfcr djuk vko’;d ugha gSA izn’kZ 10 ds eqrkfcd 4-10
ch?kk ls vf/kd dk dCtk oknh la?k dk Fkk vkSj mu ij vf/kd dCts esa cqudjksa ds
edku cus gq, Fks] mUgha edkuksa ij izfroknhx.k dkfct gSa vkSj mlh Hkwfe ds laca/k esa
dkykarj esa iV~Vk uxjifj”kn ls izkIr dj fy;k tkuk bl ekeys ds fjdkWMZ ls Li”V
gSA ,slh voLFkk esa ykbZlsal nsrs oDr feyfe;rh vf/kdkj ugha gksus ek= ls
izfroknhx.k ;g vk/kkj ugha ys ldrs fd oknh la?k mUgsa csn[ky djus dh dk;Zokgh
ugha dj ldrk] dsoy uxjifj”kn gh mUgsa csn[ky djus dh dk;Zokgh dj ldrk
gksA bl ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; o izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; dh concurrent
findings oknh dk ykbZlsalj o izfroknh dk ykbZlsalh gksuk vkSj ykbZlsal Revoke gks
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33251] (11 of 11) [CSA-192/2025]
tkus ls izfroknhx.k ls dCtk oknh la?k dks izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gksuk
vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA
28- ,slh voLFkk esa bl ekeys ds rF;ksa o lk{;ksa ds ifjizs{k esa vihykFkhZ dh
vksj ls izLrkfor ;k dksbZ vU; Substantial question of law cuuk ugha ik;k
tkrk gSA ,slh voLFkk esa rhuksa vihy vihykFkhZx.k [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
29- vr% rhuksa izdj.kksa esa vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr vihys [kkfjt dh
tkrh gSaA izR;sd ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh’k] ukxkSj ds fu.kZ;
fnukafdr 14-12-2023 vkSj izR;sd ekeys esa vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr izFke vihy
esa vij ftyk U;k;k/kh’k la[;k 01] ukxkSj ds fu.kZ; fnukafdr 24-02-2025 dh iqf”V
dh tkrh gSA
30- rhuksa izdj.kksa esa bl fu.kZ; dh izfr fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; o izFke
vihyh; U;k;ky; dks Hksth tkosA yafcr izkFkZuk i= Hkh fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
229-kumawat/-
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:22:34 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_2]
Source link