Joginder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 29 July, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Joginder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 29 July, 2025

Bench: Sudhanshu Dhulia, Aravind Kumar

                                                          1




     ITEM NO.9                              COURT NO.8                            SECTION II-B

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                              No(s).   8426/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-01-2025
     in CRMM No. 64166/2024 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana
     at Chandigarh]

     JOGINDER SINGH                                                                 Petitioner(s)
                                                      VERSUS

     STATE               OF PUNJAB                                                  Respondent(s)

     Date : 29-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR


     For Petitioner(s)                 Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, Adv.
                                       Mr. Robindeep Singh Bhullar, Adv.
                                       Mr. Somanatha Padhan, AOR
                                       Mr. Manoj K Sharma, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                 Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR


                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

The petitioner is an accused in a case bearing FIR

No.13/2024 registered with Police Station Talwandi Sabo,

Bathinda, Punjab, for the offences punishable under Sections

15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act

(for short “the NDPS Act”) and Section 29 of the NDPS Act
Signature Not Verified

added later on. The 3rd bail application of the petitioner was
Digitally signed by
Nirmala Negi
Date: 2025.07.29
17:43:36 IST
Reason:

dismissed by the High Court under the order impugned. He has

already undergone about one year & five months in jail.
2

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

respondent-State.

Considering the nature of allegation and the period of

incarceration of the petitioner, we are of the opinion that a

case of bail is made out for the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on

bail forthwith on the usual terms and conditions to be decided

by the concerned Court.

The present petition shall stand disposed of in the above

terms along with pending application(s), if any.

(NIRMALA NEGI)                                     (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                           ASSISTANT REGISTRAR