State vs Mangilal And Ors … on 28 July, 2025

0
22

[ad_1]

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Judgment

Per Hon’ble Mr. Manoj Kumar Garg, J.

28/07/2025

Instant criminal appeal under Section 378(3)(1) of Cr.P.C.

has been filed by the State against the judgment dated

30.03.1998, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sirohi in Sessions

Case No.122/1996, whereby the learned trial court acquitted the

accused-respondents from the offences punishable under Sections

302, 302/34 IPC.

Brief facts necessary to be noted for deciding the controversy

are that on 23.05.1996, upon receiving information from the

Government Hospital, Sirohi, Shri Vishnulal, SHO, Sirohi (PW-25)

reached there and recorded the statement of Mobtaram as

[2025:RJ-JD:33012-DB] (2 of 10) [CRLA-627/1998]

Ex-P/21. Injured Mobtaram stated that on the demise of his

father-in-law, he went to village Joyla. When, Mobtaram was at his

in-laws’ house, his brother-in-law Mangiya offered him milk, but

he refused. Then, his mother-in-law, brother-in-law (sadu) and his

wife Saku, forcibly compelled him to consume the milk. Two days

ago, Mobtaram requested his in-laws to send his wife Saku, upon

which, his brother-in-law Mangiya allegedly slapped him.

Subsequently, his in-law’s purportedly mixed some substance into

the milk and forcibly made him drink it, with the apparent intent

to cause his death. After consuming the milk, he felt dizzy while

traveling by bus towards his native village. Upon reaching Maadar

village, he began to vomit. Thereafter, the Mobtaram’s brother

Chhoga, his mother and nephew Chhagan took him to the

Government hospital in Sirohi. He alleged that his in-laws

attempted to murder him by administering poisoned milk against

his will.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here