Prasadi Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 30 July, 2025

0
2


Patna High Court – Orders

Prasadi Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 30 July, 2025

Author: Sunil Dutta Mishra

Bench: Sunil Dutta Mishra

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46401 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-520 Year-2023 Thana- KAHALGAON District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
           1.    Prasadi Mahto Son of Late Angat Mahto @ Late Angad Mahto village -
                 Mahisha Munda, P.S. - Kahalgaon, Dist. - Bhagalpur
           2.    Subhash Mahto Son of Prasadi Mahto village - Mahisha Munda, P.S. -
                 Kahalgaon, Dist. - Bhagalpur


                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nityanand, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                                 ORAL ORDER


2   30-07-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 520 of 2023 instituted under

Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 354, 504, 506 and 379 of the

Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, 13 accused persons

including the petitioner came at the house of the informant and

assaulted her son and niece. It is further alleged that petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46401 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025
2/3

No. 1 caught hold the son of the informant and co-accused

Sudhanshu Mahto hit him with the butt of pistol on his head.

Allegation against petitioner No. 2 is that he has tried to outrage

the modesty of the niece of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

case. Petitioners and informant are own gotiya and due to land

dispute, some altercation took place between them and the false

allegation has been made against the petitioners. Injuries are

simple in nature. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent in

which they are on bail. Petitioners undertakes to co-operate in

the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event

of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing

bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two

sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with

Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 520 of 2023, subject to the conditions
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46401 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025
3/3

laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here