Chandi Charan Patra vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 31 July, 2025

0
3

1. Petitioner herein has assailed the impugned judgment and order dated

15.07.2017, passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC 2nd Court,

Tamluk, in Criminal Revision No. 194 of 2016, whereby and whereunder the

court below set aside the trial Court’s order of discharge passed in favour of

2025:CHC-AS:1438
the petitioner herein, dated 28 October, 2016 and thereby requested the
th

trial court to record evidence of the witnesses of the opposite

party/complainant and thereafter to pass an order as per the provisions of

law.

2. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the court below, learned

counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein by dint of an

agreement for sale, filed a suit for specific performance of contract and said

suit being Other Suit no. 88 of 1993 was decreed in favour of the petitioner

and the court directed the defendant to execute sale deed in favour of

petitioner herein in respect of the suit property vide judgement dated 22nd

March, 2011. Thereafter failure on the part of the defendant, the deed was

executed by the executing court in favour of the petitioner in Execution Case

no. 2 of 2012 by an order dated 23rd November, 2012. By dint of that sale

deed the petitioner got possession over the suit property with the help of

court bailiff on 25th January, 2013. Thereafter petitioner herein Chandi

Charan Patra lodged a written FIR to the Panskura Police Station that on

25th January, 2013, he was given possession of the land through the

process server of court but on 04.02.2013 at about 4.30 p.m., taking

advantages of his temporary absence the opposite party /accused persons

broke open the lock so fixed by him of the said house and entered the said

house and stolen utensils and valuable gifts and on the basis of such

allegations, Panskura Police Station case no. 29 of 2013 dated 04.02.2013

under sections 448/461/380/34 of the IPC was started. After completion of

investigation on 31st March, 2013 police submitted charges sheet in the said

case. After conclusion of trial the Trial Court convicted offender Mrityunjoy

2025:CHC-AS:1438
Sahoo and Dipali Sahoo, being GR case no. 187 of 2013. It is further

submitted that challenging the order of conviction dated 06.07.2022 an

appeal has been preferred before the learned Sessions Judge, being Criminal

appeal no. 4 of 2023.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here